Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently Rhule spoke to Charlotte reporters


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Sounds like we might be moving away from the WCO base (haven't looked at McAdoo's past philosophy)

Ugh 😖

Just based on some quick searching, seems like his foundation is WCO:

Can Ben McAdoo Fix the Panthers Offense? - Sports Illustrated Carolina Panthers News, Analysis and More

How Ben McAdoo’s New Offense Will Fly | PFF News & Analysis | PFF

Do Panthers, Ben McAdoo have a potential fit in Jimmy Garoppolo? (usatoday.com)

Might just be some coach speak by Rhule, its not like a coach is going to admit we want to run sideways.  Coaches have a habit of telling fans what they want to hear.  

If we do end up going to more of a power based running attack, that might actually lower Linderbaum down our draft board.  A lot of the reports I've seen on him is that he is more suited for zone.  He definitely doesn't fit the "bigger" profile.

 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Just based on some quick searching, seems like his foundation is WCO:

Can Ben McAdoo Fix the Panthers Offense? - Sports Illustrated Carolina Panthers News, Analysis and More

How Ben McAdoo’s New Offense Will Fly | PFF News & Analysis | PFF

Do Panthers, Ben McAdoo have a potential fit in Jimmy Garoppolo? (usatoday.com)

Might just be some coach speak by Rhule, its not like a coach is going to admit we want to run sideways.  Coaches have a habit of telling fans what they want to hear.  

If we do end up going to more of a power based running attack, that might actually lower Linderbaum down our draft board.  A lot of the reports I've seen on him is that he is more suited for zone.  He definitely doesn't fit the "bigger" profile.

WCO was what I figured because that's the style we've run, but bigger, "downhill" linemen don't necessarily fit that sort of approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

WCO was what I figured because that's the style we've run, but bigger, "downhill" linemen don't necessarily fit that sort of approach.

What’s even stranger is the stretch zone approach mainly in the gun Brady ran.

It really seems like he has no idea what to do on offense and it’s all just blah blah blah

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

"Building the team the right way"

Then why does Rhule still have roster control?

I think that means is make panic trades and piss poor QB choices one after the other, thats the "right way"....

 

I wish one of those years they took the "hard" way and fixed the god dam cap while stock piling picks. No more "redoing" over-rated players with contracts either, pick out the true young core and pay them with normal deals. Besides this blackhole cycle of trying to go .500 and even failing at that. Tiresome so tiresome. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Chaos said:

I hate Rhule like he murdered family members

I definitely feel a lot different about Rhule than I did about Fox and Rivera at the end. Maybe it's because we actually had success under those other guys. Maybe it's because I actually respected them as people and didn't think they were lying their asses off every time they opened their mouth. Maybe a little bit of both.

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
×
×
  • Create New...