Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Incoming LT?


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

What's interesting to me is that if we don't trade for Watson, we can easily grab a good LT in the draft.  But if we trade for Watson, we need to go hard after a LT in free agency.

I think we are getting a new QB no matter what.  If we get Watson we have no pick to draft a LT.  If we miss on Watson we are drafting a QB (hopefully WIllis, but possibly Pickett).  We are QB crazy right now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Just trying to figure out how we shell out the money for a top Guard, big money on LT, and huge on QB...  If we can ditch Darnold's cap hit then it makes sense.  Man that was a dumb move extending him...

welll if he fits into the Watson trade, we will never have to worry about it again, ahha. That would help me sleep at night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

I think we are getting a new QB no matter what.  If we get Watson we have no pick to draft a LT.  If we miss on Watson we are drafting a QB (hopefully WIllis, but possibly Pickett).  We are QB crazy right now...

I like signing Cam, and drafting Willis.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cdparr7 said:

I think Moses is RT, likely Fisher, maybe Collins. I think Armstead takes us out of DW seeepstakes. Dude Is wanting like 20-25 million per year.

i corrected my screenshot. I got a little ahead of myself with the highlighter  Fisher is absolute garbage, we'd be better with BC or even erving compared to how Fisher played last year.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If we get him then we are out on Watson right?  Also I would assume we go QB in the draft then?

Actually perhaps the opposite.  Could mean we are trading six and won't be able to draft a tackle.  But still trying to upgrade line for Watson, which is likely concern for him: and must be addressed before he agrees to any trade.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

O Line: Big free agent LT, Christensen, Elf, Austin Corbett, Moton.

QB: Deshaun Watson

WR: DJ Moore, Anderson, Marshall JR 

Running back: CMC, Hubbard

TE: Tremble, Ian Thomas 

👀👀👀

 

Rhule as HC negates it all. The talent will have to surmount the coaching significantly. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Can you Imagine:

O Line: Big free agent LT, Christensen, Elf, Austin Corbett, Moton.

QB: Deshaun Watson

WR: DJ Moore, Anderson, Marshall JR 

Running back: CMC, Hubbard

TE: Tremble, Ian Thomas 

👀👀👀

 

I think Shi Smith is going to step up this year as well. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Its probably Eric Fisher, lol

Armstead seems like he would cost too much. 

Eric Fisher was pretty good at one point but that reeks of Matt Kalil 2.0 for us. Please no unless it's a 1 year cheap deal or something.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...