Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers signing bozeman


w280sax
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Billy Goat said:

Great addition. With the way the OL is shaping up and with the defense also being strengthened even Darnold could carry this team to enough wins to see them pick outside the top 10. If they’re strengthening this much in free agency the idea of tanking to get a QB in 2023 just isn’t going to happen. It’s probably a certainty they now try and bring in another QB via a trade.

I agreed with 100% until the last line. I see this as a signal that we're drafting a QB at 6. Especially if they're going for Armstead too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Nahh, olineman very hard to judge 

1 year is excellent, what was stupid is the two year trash olineman last year

if he performs, pay him when we actually have the cash and it won’t prevent more signings 

these structures/length are just as import to me and they have been excellent, I’m tired of getting stuck with trash on contracts like Paradis for example

Fitterer scared me last year.  His first signing was Sullivan, a tweener TE WR from Seattle, then he signed Erv and Elf--on day 1 of the tampering period--to multi-year contracts--when both had underperformed at other places.  This guy, however, was solid at both G for 2 years and C last year--so he should not be hard to judge.  There is film of him blocking for Lamar Jackson and the Ravens.  But either way, he will earn the next contract, and it will be more expensive.  I see your point, however.  And in my view, Erving and Elflein should have been given 1-year deals, not Bozeman, but we shall see.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

This is starting to feel like the best FA period we have ever had.  My God this is amazing.

Also, Elflein, go sit your ass down somewhere. 

Elflein will move to MLB or CB - he's got one of the fastest backpedals on the team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, onmyown said:

Nahh, olineman very hard to judge 

1 year is excellent, what was stupid is the two year trash olineman last year

if he performs, pay him when we actually have the cash and it won’t prevent more signings 

these structures/length are just as import to me and they have been excellent, I’m tired of getting stuck with trash on contracts like Paradis for example

Hmm I never really thought about it that way, but it makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I might end up reviving my old "Big Ugly" signature once the lineup is set 🤔

I'm sitting here in dismay by the two FA signings honestly.  Shocked really. Not sure if I should be optimistic that they may have figured it out or depressed that i may have missed judged the value of these two particular FA's.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...