Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers NOT signing another safety? Or just not Tyrann Mathieu...


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Go back and watch Kam Chancellor on Seattle. That's the blueprint for how we should be using Chinn.

Yeah.. he had Bobby Wagner and K.J. Wright eating up all his blocks.. we don’t have that.

As our current roster stands he’d be a better fit at LB unless we land an elite OLB.

I’m not saying he can’t play SS because you are 100% right, most of his coverage struggles were from playing deep. I just don’t think with our current personnel it uses his talent the best.

What we’ll see is Chinn making tackles 5 and 6 yards down the field.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Yeah.. he had Bobby Wagner and K.J. Wright eating up all his blocks.. we don’t have that.

As our current roster stands he’d be a better fit at LB unless we land an elite OLB.

I’m not saying he can’t play SS because you are 100% right, most of his coverage struggles were from playing deep. I just don’t think with our current personnel it uses his talent the best.

What we’ll see is Chinn making tackles 5 and 6 yards down the field.

You think he'll have to take on fewer blocks at LB than at SS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You think he'll have to take on fewer blocks at LB than at SS?

It’s not about him taking on blocks, it’s about where he’ll be making the tackle.

In a perfect world we have Luke and Shaq playing LB and Chinn coming in at SS.

Currently we don’t have an elite OLB which will allow teams to run it down our throat. At SS, Chinn would be making all of the tackles five yards down the field. At LB, there’s at least a chance for a TFL or limiting the RB to a short gain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...