Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Malik Willis Pro Day


 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Lets go get it Canes said:

Ummm no one is said that. Stay on topic. Lamar isn’t healthy. He is a running qb and like allll of them, he won’t win a super bowl. 

In 49 starts he's 37-12 with 84 passing TDs and 31 INT.   

In four seasons he's been to two pro bowls, been MVP and First team all Pro.

Objectively speaking he's been successful.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Where would you place cam. Because most people would say then and now he couldn't pass.

Said it elsewhere, and have said many times, Newton is a Brett Favre level passer. John Elway compares too.

All three guys had general vicinity accuracy and some level of inconsistency. You could see them throw a pass that looked laser accurate on one play, then throw one that would miss the broad side of a barn the next. Whether or not they won games depended on which type of pass they threw more.

I've sometimes referred to them as OMG / WTF passers because some passes made you say OMG and others made you say WTF 😆

And yes, you can win with guys like that if you build around them properly. All three made Super Bowls and two of them won championships (Elway won two).

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Panther'sBigD said:

Some of y'all are getting all excited about drafting Armanti Edwards 2.0 in the top of the first round. 

They're both black can run with the ball and went to a small school so obviously he's Armanti Edwards 2.0 🙄

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Said it elsewhere, and have said many times, Newton is a Brett Favre level passer. John Elway compares too.

All three guys had general vicinity accuracy and some level of inconsistency. You could see them throw a pass that looked laser accurate on one play, then throw one that would miss the broad side of a barn the next. Whether or not they won games depended on which type of pass they threw more.

I've sometimes referred to them as OMG / WTF passers because some passes made you say OMG and others made you say WTF 😆

And yes, you can win with guys like that if you build around them properly. All three made Super Bowls and two of them won championships (Elway won two).

Ok this I agree 100% on. I just think a qbs success and winning a championship isn't 100% on them as many people think. People like to say newton not winning a super bowl is because he wasn't good enough as a passer when other factors like Byron bell and the other horrible tackle came into play.

Winning a championship is a team effort. Not having elite wrs who can help a qb matters. Having a cmc like back matters. Having say von miller on the other side matters. Elite shut down CBS. Its not all on the qb to win a game.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

These pro days do nothing for me, I think a waste honestly. You see what they do on film when they have to throw with someone coming at them and covering guy their throwing to.

That isn't how scouting works. You look at film of Willis vs say macaroon state.. that doesn't tell you as much as him throwing to nfl caliber players and seeing him vs = competition. Can he make all the throws? Because on tape his offense was a 1 read and go. Can he do and process more if asked? That's what these are for.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Doubt we'd drop back all the way to 20 

We could get this year's first, second, and 2023's first (probably a top 10-12 pick). 

That could be interesting if we have to draft a QB in 2023 (we'd have 2 draft picks).

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...