Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corral Pro Day Today


ForJimmy
 Share

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I like corral. Big time arm. 

Yes, the only criticism I have heard is about his "frail" (thin) body.  But Simms said he is perfect for the "new" NFL offenses.   It would make me feel better if he shines today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Yes, the only criticism I have heard is about his "frail" (thin) body.  But Simms said he is perfect for the "new" NFL offenses.   It would make me feel better if he shines today.

Yeah he has a Zach Wilson body type. 6 3 205. Problem with him is his playing style. He will get fuged up in the nfl if he continues to lower his shoulder. He’s too small. He is very talented tho.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I feel like whoever has their pro day last will be the guy that everybody wants 😕

By the time Corral finishes his workout the same folks that were screaming for Willis will be screaming for Corral and calling any with doubts a hater or racist. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the QB school and he pointed out some mechanical issues with Corral--they could be corrected.  One: Throws from his toes at times.

two: Skip step to throw deep ball (The NFL will not allow that)

those were the two main things that were pointed out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

An almost dream scenario for me would be trading pick 6 to the eagles for pick 16 and 19 so they could land one of the top DE and we somehow get Penning and Corral.  Unlikely?   Sure, but one could dream.

Going by the draft chart 16 + 19 are worth more than 6.

Pick 6 is 2092. Pick 16 (1595) + 19 (1508) = 3,103.

The difference of 1,011 is between pick 50 (1,018) and 51 (1,007). We'd have to give them something equivalent to a mid 2nd rounder when we don't have a 2nd or 3rd round pick. A player or a future pick are the only options I see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Going by the draft chart 16 + 19 are worth more than 6.

Pick 6 is 2092. Pick 16 (1595) + 19 (1508) = 3,103.

The difference of 1,011 is between pick 50 (1,018) and 51 (1,007). We'd have to give them something equivalent to a mid 2nd rounder when we don't have a 2nd or 3rd round pick. A player or a future pick are the only options I see. 

The charts I had looked at valued it at 1600 to 1875, with the difference basically being an early third value.  Trades dont always go to chart value these days.  Its just a basic guide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

The charts I had looked at valued it at 1600 to 1875, with the difference basically being an early third value.  Trades dont always go to chart value these days.  Its just a basic guide.

I was using the Fitzgerald-Spielberger NFL Draft Trade Value Chart. I'm sure different teams use different charts. 

You know this might explain the "don't send us negative points" comment from Tepper last year. If that team used a different chart, they might have thought they were giving us value and we saw it as "negative points".

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corral was the QB1 when the season kicked off and slowly lost traction. Injury in the Bowl game didn't help his cause either. 

Agree w/ MHS - high level of SEC competition, in between Willis and Pickett for measurables, competitor/personality is there, etc. 

Will be intriguing for sure. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI...

Florio points out that the draft would be the obvious place to look for a possible long-term solution.

Falcons GM Terry Fontenot acknowledges that they're going to be looking hard at the draft prospects but says he won't reach for one.

If I had to guess, I'd say they're probably going to draft a quarterback.

Something to keep in mind if you're talking about trading back...

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...