Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corral Pro Day Today


ForJimmy
 Share

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I like corral. Big time arm. 

Yes, the only criticism I have heard is about his "frail" (thin) body.  But Simms said he is perfect for the "new" NFL offenses.   It would make me feel better if he shines today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Yes, the only criticism I have heard is about his "frail" (thin) body.  But Simms said he is perfect for the "new" NFL offenses.   It would make me feel better if he shines today.

Yeah he has a Zach Wilson body type. 6 3 205. Problem with him is his playing style. He will get fuged up in the nfl if he continues to lower his shoulder. He’s too small. He is very talented tho.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I feel like whoever has their pro day last will be the guy that everybody wants 😕

By the time Corral finishes his workout the same folks that were screaming for Willis will be screaming for Corral and calling any with doubts a hater or racist. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the QB school and he pointed out some mechanical issues with Corral--they could be corrected.  One: Throws from his toes at times.

two: Skip step to throw deep ball (The NFL will not allow that)

those were the two main things that were pointed out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

An almost dream scenario for me would be trading pick 6 to the eagles for pick 16 and 19 so they could land one of the top DE and we somehow get Penning and Corral.  Unlikely?   Sure, but one could dream.

Going by the draft chart 16 + 19 are worth more than 6.

Pick 6 is 2092. Pick 16 (1595) + 19 (1508) = 3,103.

The difference of 1,011 is between pick 50 (1,018) and 51 (1,007). We'd have to give them something equivalent to a mid 2nd rounder when we don't have a 2nd or 3rd round pick. A player or a future pick are the only options I see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Going by the draft chart 16 + 19 are worth more than 6.

Pick 6 is 2092. Pick 16 (1595) + 19 (1508) = 3,103.

The difference of 1,011 is between pick 50 (1,018) and 51 (1,007). We'd have to give them something equivalent to a mid 2nd rounder when we don't have a 2nd or 3rd round pick. A player or a future pick are the only options I see. 

The charts I had looked at valued it at 1600 to 1875, with the difference basically being an early third value.  Trades dont always go to chart value these days.  Its just a basic guide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

The charts I had looked at valued it at 1600 to 1875, with the difference basically being an early third value.  Trades dont always go to chart value these days.  Its just a basic guide.

I was using the Fitzgerald-Spielberger NFL Draft Trade Value Chart. I'm sure different teams use different charts. 

You know this might explain the "don't send us negative points" comment from Tepper last year. If that team used a different chart, they might have thought they were giving us value and we saw it as "negative points".

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corral was the QB1 when the season kicked off and slowly lost traction. Injury in the Bowl game didn't help his cause either. 

Agree w/ MHS - high level of SEC competition, in between Willis and Pickett for measurables, competitor/personality is there, etc. 

Will be intriguing for sure. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI...

Florio points out that the draft would be the obvious place to look for a possible long-term solution.

Falcons GM Terry Fontenot acknowledges that they're going to be looking hard at the draft prospects but says he won't reach for one.

If I had to guess, I'd say they're probably going to draft a quarterback.

Something to keep in mind if you're talking about trading back...

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ha-ha, I bet that went through everyone's mind.  Admittedly I don't read all the comments in a thread before I make a post. Great minds think alike!
    • Cam was hitting his stride as a QB in 2017/2018.     This is why I think stats like completion percentage are overrated. As long as a QB is clutch and makes the throws to win the game the rest doesn’t really matter. What good is a check down stat padder if they’re a choker.  Until Norv Turner (and briefly Chud) got here we put Cam in high pressure throwing situations all the time. We also ran the ball on first down more than most teams in the NFL in the Ron era. Coupled with shitty WRs, all that is expressed in his stats. I also assume Cam took the ball in his hands on many occasions rather than trust Funchess to catch the ball.    It was also never Cams job to play the game like someone else. His presence on the field dictated the game in a way that is rarely seen.  He showed he could play the dink and dunk game just before TJ Watt. That didn’t suddenly make him better than his earlier seasons. He just got put in a legit under center  passing game again for first time since his rookie year with Chud.    Ron took the quickest path to success and abused the RPO because his ass was about to get fired.    Cam never got the credit for being the cerebral player that he was. I just think when you are legitimately a human Superman, sometimes the best play is having the ball in your hands. He was a better passer than Delhomme was. 
    • I don't think Canales has any problem benching Bryce or moving on if Bryce doesn't come out playing like the end of last year.  It's year 3 no more excuses for Bryce
×
×
  • Create New...