Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold outta here?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Only way this makes sense is if we’re bringing in a big time player otherwise it’s just compounding the problem.

how?

 

18 mil in cap space could upgrade several positions

 

otherwise that 18 mil is holding a clipboard. 

 

obviously depends on the pieces in the trade, but i fail to see how this is compounding things. if anything its expediting  righting a wrong. 

Edited by The Huddler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

What is their idea of a young player? Chubba Hubbard, Terrace Marshall? I mean… we don’t particularly need anymore cap room this year so if we have to give away decent players to get rid of him then you might as well just let him finish out his 5th year.

nooooo to marshall.  that dude is going to be great. 

 

Chuba, yeah ship 'em out. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

how?

 

18 mil in cap space could upgrade several positions

 

otherwise that 18 mil is holding a clipboard. 

 

obviously depends on the pieces in the trade, but i fail to see how this is compounding things. if anything its expediting  righting a wrong. 

Because it doesn’t make sense to give up a young player just so a team takes darnold and his 19 mill cap hit. It’s just one year and we’re free. We have enough cap as it is. It compounds things because we already gave up a 2nd for Darnold and now we’re gonna give up a young player to get rid of him? Just compounding the horrific mistake of trading a 2nd for him and then signing off on his 5th year contract without seeing him play a down.

the only way this makes sense is if we’re getting a big time player and need more cap room. 
 

I swear to god if this is so we can trade for Jimmy g I’m done with this team.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I just don't get that logic.  He obviously is horrible and won't be playing here again and he's on the last year of his deal.  Why not just essentially buy him out because you're paying him for the year anyway, and just pay him to go away...  why would I offer assets to another team to do what I can do myself by just buying him out and sending him away?  His hit is off the books next season anyway and its not like we're going to use that 18M this season, so whats the point?

huh?

 

why wouldnt we use that 18 mil?

 

depends on what we give up, but getting 18 mil in cap space would go a long way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, unicar15 said:

We’re gonna give up an asset to get rid of Rhule’s mistake? That is some trueeeee BS. We better get something in return for that young player other than just “take this poo 5th year option we shouldn’t have given up anyway.”

depends on the asset

 

giving up an average run of the mil player for 18 mil that could get us several good players..

 

what am i missing here? seems like a no brainer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Because it doesn’t make sense to give up a young player just so a team takes darnold and his 19 mill cap hit. It’s just one year and we’re free. We have enough cap as it is. It compounds things because we already gave up a 2nd for Darnold and now we’re gonna give up a young player to get rid of him? Just compounding the horrific mistake of trading a 2nd for him and then signing off on his 5th year contract without seeing him play a down.

the only way this makes sense is if we’re getting a big time player and need more cap room. 
 

I swear to god if this is so we can trade for Jimmy g I’m done with this team.

 

 

depends on who the young player is

 

Someone like Chuba or Shi smith?

 

thats a no brainer!!    you are basically giving up Chuba or Shi and getting 18 mil in return..

 

no brainer bro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

 

depends on who the young player is

 

Someone like Chuba or Shi smith?

 

thats a no brainer!!    you are basically giving up Chuba or Shi and getting 18 mil in return..

 

no brainer bro

I’d rather keep Shi. They can have Chuba or Fletch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lmao that's a good point; but at the same time I think and HOPE Canales learned from how he operated last year, only giving us one real look against the Bills that had people shouting 'Super Bowl'...only to come out flat.
    • I mean the whole defense was trash, he was at least trying. Besides if you put a all-pro among 10 PSers, that all-world will look human. It's very hard to judge very bad units and find the best players among them. Horn and Mjack played well too, there was 0 pass rush and -1777784 run defense. 
    • I was looking back and seen Evan Neal has made the switch to OG after awful years at OT.......I wanted him over Icky for his tricep alone..... I was 100% stroud too, I was super pissed about his record setting and playoff leading start......I had arich vastly over the midget BY too. But right now, BY is about the only one on the up&up. The Texans used lots of prime draft capital to help Stroud.  It's still not ready. But if you're honestly about past drafts, these GMs are not alone in making mistakes.  I still feel they should stayed put and allowed Carter to fall in their lap, but best I know Tepper had the worst rage about landing a QB for the past 5 years. The deal is with the correct coaching staff, Baker or darnold would still be here....Baker has signed 3 years for 100 million, which is a great NFL QB contract. Tepper hiring rhule and his shitty Baylor/temple staff was a massive setback given rhule was in control too. Then panic set in an d fitteerererererer had to make a winner and find a QB. Ugh.....I hope they are back... 
×
×
  • Create New...