Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold outta here?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Only way this makes sense is if we’re bringing in a big time player otherwise it’s just compounding the problem.

how?

 

18 mil in cap space could upgrade several positions

 

otherwise that 18 mil is holding a clipboard. 

 

obviously depends on the pieces in the trade, but i fail to see how this is compounding things. if anything its expediting  righting a wrong. 

Edited by The Huddler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

What is their idea of a young player? Chubba Hubbard, Terrace Marshall? I mean… we don’t particularly need anymore cap room this year so if we have to give away decent players to get rid of him then you might as well just let him finish out his 5th year.

nooooo to marshall.  that dude is going to be great. 

 

Chuba, yeah ship 'em out. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

how?

 

18 mil in cap space could upgrade several positions

 

otherwise that 18 mil is holding a clipboard. 

 

obviously depends on the pieces in the trade, but i fail to see how this is compounding things. if anything its expediting  righting a wrong. 

Because it doesn’t make sense to give up a young player just so a team takes darnold and his 19 mill cap hit. It’s just one year and we’re free. We have enough cap as it is. It compounds things because we already gave up a 2nd for Darnold and now we’re gonna give up a young player to get rid of him? Just compounding the horrific mistake of trading a 2nd for him and then signing off on his 5th year contract without seeing him play a down.

the only way this makes sense is if we’re getting a big time player and need more cap room. 
 

I swear to god if this is so we can trade for Jimmy g I’m done with this team.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I just don't get that logic.  He obviously is horrible and won't be playing here again and he's on the last year of his deal.  Why not just essentially buy him out because you're paying him for the year anyway, and just pay him to go away...  why would I offer assets to another team to do what I can do myself by just buying him out and sending him away?  His hit is off the books next season anyway and its not like we're going to use that 18M this season, so whats the point?

huh?

 

why wouldnt we use that 18 mil?

 

depends on what we give up, but getting 18 mil in cap space would go a long way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, unicar15 said:

We’re gonna give up an asset to get rid of Rhule’s mistake? That is some trueeeee BS. We better get something in return for that young player other than just “take this poo 5th year option we shouldn’t have given up anyway.”

depends on the asset

 

giving up an average run of the mil player for 18 mil that could get us several good players..

 

what am i missing here? seems like a no brainer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Because it doesn’t make sense to give up a young player just so a team takes darnold and his 19 mill cap hit. It’s just one year and we’re free. We have enough cap as it is. It compounds things because we already gave up a 2nd for Darnold and now we’re gonna give up a young player to get rid of him? Just compounding the horrific mistake of trading a 2nd for him and then signing off on his 5th year contract without seeing him play a down.

the only way this makes sense is if we’re getting a big time player and need more cap room. 
 

I swear to god if this is so we can trade for Jimmy g I’m done with this team.

 

 

depends on who the young player is

 

Someone like Chuba or Shi smith?

 

thats a no brainer!!    you are basically giving up Chuba or Shi and getting 18 mil in return..

 

no brainer bro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

 

depends on who the young player is

 

Someone like Chuba or Shi smith?

 

thats a no brainer!!    you are basically giving up Chuba or Shi and getting 18 mil in return..

 

no brainer bro

I’d rather keep Shi. They can have Chuba or Fletch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
    • Fees nowadays are ridiculous. After purchasing concert tickets for my son’s 18th birthday and paying the rest of our HHI trip with 3 other families, I’m shocked at how much they are. Honestly, it’s grand theft. Some is taxes but in a world where everything is electronic, fees should be cheaper. Electrons don’t cost 10-30% of the event.
×
×
  • Create New...