Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Running QBs don’t win Superb Owls


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Such a dumb argument. Hill, RG3, The Golden Calf of Bristol are all busts that never made it as QBs in the NFL. Hill isn’t even a QB honestly… Should I make pocket QBs who have busted? Your list is just Cam, Lamar, Vick, and Murray. If you think Cam’s running ability is why we lost the Super Bowl you weren’t watching the game. Vick wasn’t developed by the Falcons leading to injuries and then the off fields issues messed his career up. Andy Reid coached him up in Philadelphia, but it was later in his career.

Running QBs can be developed into Josh Allen, Steve Young, Elway, Rodgers type players than can beat you in the pocket or make you pay with their legs. The problem is teams seem hesitant to beef up the OL when they have QBs that can run like the Cards, Panthers with Cam, and Falcons. You have to build a team around any QB to win it all. The Bills are doing it right and will have as good a chance as anyone to win it all with a QB who can run and has running plays drawn up for him.

You hit the nail on the head in the middle with the lack of investment by front offices in OLs BECAUSE they feel the QB can run out if trouble. It contributes to those QB struggles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

What even is a “running QB” anymore?

QBs who run it 50+ yds a game: Jalen Hurts, Lamar Jackson, Josh Allen. That's it. There are three. And you can be elite and be a running QB btw. A running QB will win it all one day, just due to probability. I just don't like the wear and tear their bodies take. Jackson is already seeing breakdown. Hurts won't be far off as much as they run him. Bills would be morons if they don't dial Allen back. If they don't, he will be brittle too. Same thing with our RUNNING BACK ... CMC. He's too small to run it all the time. Vick's body wore down. Even Big Ben (not a running QB) and Cam (up for debate if he is) show wore after being abused. I know QBs who run are fun to watch ... but it's just not smart. Give me a Mahomes or a Prescott ... who can run if needed but are much more about the passing. The crazy thing is we know Lamar Jackson can throw it, but they still have him run too much. Insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

In the past 10 super bowls pocket passers have won all but 2.  I count Mahomes and Wilson as "mobile" qbs.  However in the mahomes playoff run he had a total of 50 yards rushing and wilson had a total of 40 yards rushing in his.  Running and even mobile qbs seem to be way overrated when it comes to the playoffs.  You have to beat good defenses with passing in the pocket

There’s running and then there is running for yardage.  Those guys both run around a ton, they are just really good at keeping their eyes downfield and throwing b4 they cross the los.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

So Pat, Steve, Russell, and Aaron are not mobile QBs? Ok...

Those other guys you named are trash, a pure running QB is garbage like the majority of the guys you named outside of Lamar and Cam. 

You need a QB that can pass first, but have the ability to run. 

Hai Guyz, trash ass QBs like Vick, RG3, Te-bow, and Taysom hill never won  a SB!!!!111

How can you guys not understand the difference between a running QB and a mobile QB?

Guys like Vick run cause they can't throw that well. They are more skilled running than passing. 

Guys Like Russ and Young run as a last resort and their primary weapon is their arm.

 

Vick Cam Lamar Hill are more skilled running than throwing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

It’s dumb how you pivot and define running QBs to fit a small scale. 4 of the top 11 QBs with the most rushing yards all time have rings. Period. So out of the top 11 QBs that have the most career rushing yards 36-37% won a Super Bowl. Here is a dumb blanket statement for you. Based on history, pocket QBs have a higher chance of busting than QBs that can run. 

Why are you getting so triggered?  It’s just a football topic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Lets go get it Canes said:

Why are you getting so triggered?  It’s just a football topic. 

I’m not sure you know what triggered means? Calling a statement dumb is far from it. I just gave you some data to show how dumb it was. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Verge said:

This is some really surface level observational work by OP. Willis is not anything close to Taysom Hill lol
Willis ran it a whopping 40 more times than Corral last year, he was just better at it. 

Running in the athletic conference is a wee bit different than Running in the sec

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's calling you triggered bc he's annoyed people see through this vague racist bullshit

Casually listing all the Black QBs he doesnt like (labeling them as "running") and trying to form a cogent argument while doing it, all to bash the Black QB he doesn't like in THIS draft. This place doesn't change much, man

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda embarrassing to even have this thread up lol 

there are plenty of valid reasons many haven’t won, but simply put there are 2x more traditional pocket qbs compared to “running” qbs, even that phrase is cringe, dual threat qbs is what they should be referred to as, this is asinine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lets go get it Canes said:

In 52 Super Bowls, maybe maybe one if you count Wilson but he Scrambles to make a good throw like Mahomes. Steve Young, same thing. Lamar, Vick, Cam, The Golden Calf of Bristol, RGknee, Murray, Tasum Hill, on and on.  
 

Accurate pocket passers that trust their line, make great throws, move around so they avoid hits/sacks. 
 

That’s a big hell no to Willis. Its Corral or Pickett. If you aren’t sold on either. Oline it up at least and trade for ….dear god Jimmy G or Michew and get one next year. 

Minchew PLEASE!

Use #6 to solidify O Line or trade down!!

Get QB next year.

But by all means don’t push it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...