Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Howell's Pro Day


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ImaginaryKev said:

The Panthers approach at QB has been "have your cake and eat it too" the whole time. Wouldn't surprise me at all if they did something risky like trade down for more picks (a Fitterer move), then still draft a QB to try to save the coaches job (a Rhule move) all in one Sam Darnold throwing motion

If a rookie qb in his rookie season ends up being enough to save Rhules job then maybe he shouldn't be fired hypothetically? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John_Sutter said:

My question is where the idea that Willis and Pickett are the “Top 2” came from. Willis showed the most athleticism and wow-factor, and Pickett had the best stats. But both of those dudes also have huge flaws. Seems like this is a pick your poison scenario and it depends on which poison your team/coaching staff is most immune to.

That's the thing.  Everyone sees these people outside of the NFL that have nothing to do with any teams talking about their rankings and all this and then people take it as gospel when really it could be totally different than what most teams think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

We would've never had to deal with Teddy or Sam. We would've drafted Justin Fields last year.

I did not care for Fields, but 20/20 hindsight blah blah.... I suuuure would take Fields over ALL the QBs in this class 10/10. They believed in Sam, faaar too much, that is about the 5th massive QB mistake this gang has made, including passing on fields and even mac "peak malebod " jones. Even Davis Millis is better than any QB in this draft(even before his season). I need to bump some of my older Davis Millis comments, more than few and right as rain...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I did not care for Fields, but 20/20 hindsight blah blah.... I suuuure would take Fields over ALL the QBs in this class 10/10. They believed in Sam, faaar too much, that is about the 5th massive QB mistake this gang has made, including passing on fields and even mac "peak malebod " jones. Even Davis Millis is better than any QB in this draft(even before his season). I need to bump some of my older Davis Millis comments, more than few and right as rain...

Lol can't believe ppl are still doing this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is "Keep Pounding." https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/45498715/nfl-carolina-panthers-chuba-hubbard-olympics-flag-football-track
    • This.  He knows where the seam is about to open, cuts, and accelerates hard. He’s slippery and tacklers always seem to be taking awkward angles to get to him. No dancing. Runs low and powerful. Almost never goes backwards for a loss. We’ve rarely had the guy who bounces off of tacklers. It’s nice seeing another one. 
    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
×
×
  • Create New...