Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Howell's Pro Day


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Lol can't believe ppl are still doing this

He looked like the best overall player in the whole draft one game, next game UDFA. I hate those types with a passion. If the new staff can solve that, watch out NFL I was driving the Trey lance starship. Plus didnt fields have the worse 1st game in NFL history, something like 46(or was it 14 yards?) yards and like 2 ints? Found his barrings on route to a couple good ones and then a couple Sam Darnold ones. He'd be the clear #1 in this class, one team would trade the world for his rights. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

People who say this have zero clue about my track record of opinions on UNC prospects, they just triggered.

nah im just calling out homerism

 

pickett won the ACC with much less talented players. Ill give it to UNC..  they attract a lot of good recruits. 

 

he underwhelmed. If hes such a great QB he should have elevated his team. 

 

not saying we should get pickett either

 

 but howell is a small, long releasing QB thats going to get ate up in the NFL.  he also doesnt have that elevating it factor

 

im sorry but only UNC fans think hes the best in the draft. Everyone else has him at 4 or 5

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Huddler said:

nah im just calling out homerism

 

pickett won the ACC with much less talented players. Ill give it to UNC..  they attract a lot of good recruits. 

 

he underwhelmed. If hes such a great QB he should have elevated his team. 

 

not saying we should get pickett either

 

 but howell is a small, long releasing QB thats going to get ate up in the NFL.  he also doesnt have that elevating it factor

 

im sorry but only UNC fans think hes the best in the draft. Everyone else has him at 4 or 5

So you're not aware of my history you just arrived at the opinion you wanted to arrive at. Quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

nah im just calling out homerism

 

pickett won the ACC with much less talented players. Ill give it to UNC..  they attract a lot of good recruits. 

 

he underwhelmed. If hes such a great QB he should have elevated his team. 

 

not saying we should get pickett either

 

 but howell is a small, long releasing QB thats going to get ate up in the NFL.  he also doesnt have that elevating it factor

 

im sorry but only UNC fans think hes the best in the draft. Everyone else has him at 4 or 5

On the whole you are not wrong but this qb draft class is so crappy I think the margins between the first qb and the 5th rating qb is a ***** hair. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So you're not aware of my history you just arrived at the opinion you wanted to arrive at. Quality.

i dont need to know your history

 

i see a UNC fan saying howell is the best when everyone has him at 4 or 5.  and i mean everyone 

 

im sorry but add those things together and that = a Homer! 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Best QB in the draft. People are overthinking this.

Don't think I buy that.

But I liked Howell a lot last year, and I agree that perhaps he didn't necessarily get significantly worse so much as maybe he was on a worse team.

So if, for example, we traded down and wound up with Trevor Penning and Sam Howell, I'd be willing to at least give that the benefit of a doubt.

Not my ideal scenario, but hey... 😕

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I’m an Auburn fan (went there) and live in Knoxville. I could care less about UNC Football and I can see this guy is flying under the radar. 

I have no rooting interest involved for any QB this year.

I don't have a while lot of general interest either, but ya know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Canes now have 19 losses on the year. Here is the truly alarming stat. 13 of those were multiple goal loses. 9 of those were 3 goal plus losses. This team is getting blown out more than any other year under Rod.     why?  Blue line is a total mess. It’s just no good with their combinations.  It pains me to say this, but they were mikes better with Burns and Orlov. They need Slavin so bad.  Health.  Size. The team is too small and has no physical play. Most forwards do not forecheck.  Worst under Rod.  Goalie play. Pretty average to sub par. PK is downright bad. It’s allowing a little over a goal a game. Worst under Rod.    Team will not win a playoff round under its current group of players. It’s not constructed to do so against heavy teams.      solutions.  Must get physical size by the trade deadline. Rod and Tulsky know this. That probably has to come with the 2C.  KKs size but a better scorer and meaner.  The need another physical winger.  Goalie. Either go all in on a top guy on a bad team or get average. Lastly, better defense. Need a Right shot heavy defenseman.  Yes that could mean someone’s favorite dman could sit. Looking at you Boom.    thats 3-4 new guys that must be brought in for them to have a chance at a cup.  And it’s all players that are different and better than what they have.  They have the cap. KK is gone. Add 4 mill back.    And then hope it’s jells unlike Mikko.  
×
×
  • Create New...