Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fields/Gardner or Willis/Horn


Soul Rebel
 Share

Fields + Sauce vs. Willis + Horn  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. Knowing what you know about Fields/Horn after one year and the current state of our roster, which combination would you prefer long-term?

    • Fields in '21 & Gardner in '22
      11
    • Willis in '22 & Horn in '21
      7


Recommended Posts

Fields/Gardner for sure. If Fields was in this draft class he'd be the slam dunk #1 QB prospect which was a point I made last year around this time - Fields had the make up of a #1 overall draft pick in most draft classes. Last year's QB class was just extremely strong on paper.

I do have to wonder though... just how bad were his interviews, OSU coach feedback, etc? Because him slipping to 9th overall still doesn't make sense to me.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sir Purr said:

Darnold/Horn/Cross

So another slam dunk losing season?

Fitts had alluded to it. At some point, you have to stop pushing the chips off to the future and start swinging at QB and keep swinging until you get a hit. And as we've found out, cast off vets have by far the lowest batting percentage. The vets we actually want want no part of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Fields/Gardner for sure. If Fields was in this draft class he'd be the slam dunk #1 QB prospect which was a point I made last year around this time - Fields had the make up of a #1 overall draft pick in most draft classes. Last year's QB class was just extremely strong on paper.

I do have to wonder though... just how bad were his interviews, OSU coach feedback, etc? Because him slipping to 9th overall still doesn't make sense to me.

I thought I remembered him not being great during interviews, but you can't trust anyone during that timeframe in the NFL or media.

I wasn't a big fan of his, but I do like him more than Willis...I probably prefer Pickett or Corral to both though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

I thought I remembered him not being great during interviews, but you can't trust anyone during that timeframe in the NFL or media.

I wasn't a big fan of his, but I do like him more than Willis...I probably prefer Pickett or Corral to both though.

I'll be shocked if Pickett doesn't bust hard. The guy just isn't that good.

Absolute ceiling IMO is Kirk Cousins. Floor is David Carr.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

During draft time I always look forward to @Soul Rebel insights, but it seems like you are having the same issues others are having with this draft.

Good question- Im no fields fan at all, but for me Sauce(special player) and Fields are clear the choice. 

Im even ready to draft Sauce given the riches at CB, Im that into his game. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/12/2022 at 2:10 PM, Basbear said:

During draft time I always look forward to @Soul Rebel insights, but it seems like you are having the same issues others are having with this draft.

Good question- Im no fields fan at all, but for me Sauce(special player) and Fields are clear the choice. 

Im even ready to draft Sauce given the riches at CB, Im that into his game. 

western clint eastwood GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...