Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule and Kuechly

ChapelHeel80

By ChapelHeel80,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ichigo1057 Experienced

ichigo1057

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Is Luke swole? If not non-story.....

Not necessarily. With Luke having such a high football IQ he could potentially be a really good coach. You can't really go wrong having a guy like him on the sidelines if he was interested. That is, assuming this is true and not just a troll

Edited by ichigo1057
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ichigo1057 said:

Not necessarily. With Luke having such a high football IQ he could potentially be a really good coach. You can't really go wrong having a guy like him on the sidelines if he was interested. That is, assuming this is true and not just a troll

I dont know if Luke wants to cut his teeth in coaching. I believe he was already asked that and give a firm "No not for me". (could be wrong, if so please enlighten) Tried his hand at scouting and lasted 1 year? First rounders with millions saved, just dont do coaching. Who knows tho, luke is different. Fishing is tons less stress than getting a 2022 LB group to perform week-2-week. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mayor Qumiby Collaborator

Mayor Qumiby

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I dont know if Luke wants to cut his teeth in coaching. I believe he was already asked that and give a firm "No not for me". (could be wrong, if so please enlighten) Tried his hand at scouting and lasted 1 year? First rounders with millions saved, just dont do coaching. Who knows tho, luke is different. Fishing is tons less stress than getting a 2022 LB group to perform week-2-week. 

I think he was more interested in fishing and being outdoors and wasn't into the grind of the office poo.. maybe the itch to be back in football is getting to hard to resist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Draft intel from ESPN’s Jordan Reid

      By TD alt · Posted

      Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • MHS831
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
    • tukafan21
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I have no problem drafting a WR, even as high as the 2nd, but I do have an issue with using a precious 1st rounder on it. Another WR is a need, but we also have a lot of other needs, and the goal should always be to draft 1st rounders that you expect to be on the team for 10 years if they stay healthy. In regards to Coker, one of two things happen.  He keeps getting better and becomes our legit #2 to T-Mac and we have to pay him accordingly, or he doesn’t. If he does, then using that 1st rounder on a WR this year was dumb.  If he doesn’t, then drafting a WR in the 1st this year would be smart, but then so would trading Coker when his perceived value would be at its highest. If we were already had a SB contending roster, then yes, a 1st Round WR to put us over the top makes sense, but we just have too many holes to fill to use it that way… again, unless the staff just doesn’t believe in Coker’s ability to become a true #2, which I think he really can be.
×
×
  • Create New...