Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"What are we doing in the draft" 2022 edition.


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I don't think it's so much faith but rather blind hope.

It's like buying a single scratcher ticket for the year. Probably won't pan out but if you hit Oh Baby.

That's why I think he's the best option. We don't dig the hole any deeper by keeping him. Baker Jimmy and anyone else is barely an upgrade and digs that hole.

How does getting Baker continue to dig that hole?  He’s only going to be signed for this year and is going to cost next to nothing in draft compensation.  If he sucks he’s gone at the end of the year and we will be in a position to draft a QB again, and if he’s good we’ll then we can pay him accordingly or franchise him.  The guy actually has talent, something Darnold wishes he had.  I’m very in on giving Baker a chance, the odds of him hitting are better then any of this drafts QBs imho.  Take the OT at 6…

Worst case we get Jimmy G who is a more than competent stop gap for a year or two, could be our Alex Smith till we find our long term answer.  Jimmy G can probably take this team to the playoffs in a weak NFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Is there a prospect that most scouts seem to be high on that you're incredibly low on (aside from Carson Strong, ofc)? What about a prospect that most are low on that you're very high on?
2. Strongest/weakest position groups in your opinion for this draft?
3. Any prospects that jumped out and caught your eye while reviewing a different player? Were you able to dive more into them and if so, what's your two-line summary?
4. Who was the most fun prospect for you to scout this year and why?

Edited by Icege
SO MANY QUESTIONS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Is there a prospect that most scouts seem to be high on that you're incredibly low on (aside from Carson Strong, ofc)? What about a prospect that most are low on that you're very high on?

I don't know about most scouts, but Tariq Woolen a lot of people have going in the 1st/early 2nd and I have him as a late 3rd/4th round guy. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Icege said:

Is there a prospect that most scouts seem to be high on that you're incredibly low on (aside from Carson Strong, ofc)? What about a prospect that most are low on that you're very high on?

Just realized you had a second question lol 

People are a lot lower on George Pickens than I am. I would take him in the first round.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Brady's system was a joke.  It was as if he was using the Madden 2015 playbook at times.  He lost CMC on offense and our #1 CB on defense--his offensive line was a putrid pile of crap. 

I am not sure he can do it even with CMC, Horn, and three new offensive linemen--and the new OL coach and OC.  However, he has never played in good conditions that he trusts--

We can feel confident that he will (if he gets the opportunity) be improved.  Enough?  I dunno.

In the second half of 2019, Darnold went 6-2.  He completed 61% of his throws for 243 yds/game.  He had 13 TDs, 4 picks.  And he was 22.  His "supporting" cast was Le'veon Bell (<800 yds for the year), Robbie Anderson (779/5) and Jamison Crowder (833/6).

That's the guy I want, at least for 2022. Maybe a real offense/coordinator can find that guy or even improve him.

If that guy shows up, we'll have a competitive team.  If not, we'll have a new coach next year and probably picking in the top 5.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

In the second half of 2019, Darnold went 6-2.  He completed 61% of his throws for 243 yds/game.  He had 13 TDs, 4 picks.  And he was 22.  His "supporting" cast was Le'veon Bell (<800 yds for the year), Robbie Anderson (779/5) and Jamison Crowder (833/6).

That's the guy I want, at least for 2022. Maybe a real offense/coordinator can find that guy or even improve him.

If that guy shows up, we'll have a competitive team.  If not, we'll have a new coach next year and probably picking in the top 5.

Darnold has trouble when his line doesn't give him time to throw. So we traded for him and gave him a line that doesn't give him time to throw.  

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Verge

Any guess what type of grade teams have on Howell & Ridder? Could either one realistically go ahead of the consensus top-3/are there any teams really into them? I just find where they end up absolute wildcards and after, it may be quite some time before another QB is selected (Zappe, Glass, Coan, Strong, etc.).

Jermaine Johnson II is one of the quieter presumed high up picks--what's the deal with him?

Any fave LB for us? Muma or Tindall? Wyoming's LBs have been producing majorly and would love Muma.

And ditto on Sauce.  Aiden, Sauce, & G. Wilson are my fave players this draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NJPanthers89 said:

How does getting Baker continue to dig that hole?  He’s only going to be signed for this year and is going to cost next to nothing in draft compensation.  If he sucks he’s gone at the end of the year and we will be in a position to draft a QB again, and if he’s good we’ll then we can pay him accordingly or franchise him.  The guy actually has talent, something Darnold wishes he had.  I’m very in on giving Baker a chance, the odds of him hitting are better then any of this drafts QBs imho.  Take the OT at 6…

Worst case we get Jimmy G who is a more than competent stop gap for a year or two, could be our Alex Smith till we find our long term answer.  Jimmy G can probably take this team to the playoffs in a weak NFC.

Because he is going to win enough games to hurt our draft. I have zero confidence in a Baker Mayfield led Superbowl Championship.

 

Sam either gets it or gets us a top 5 pick he's win win.

Baker is lose lose.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of this seems perfectly logical to me. Not sure if they would pick Cross at 6 if no trade was possible. I prefer Pickett at QB but Corral would fit as well although I really worry about his sustainability considering his size and playing style. He gives me the RG3 vibe and I don't mean that as a knock on either one's ability as they are talented, but injuries are a legitimate concern when evaluating players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as far as the Baker/JimmyG debate, I'd prefer JimmyG. He's a professional and he's proven that he can at least take a good team to the playoffs. He's a great placeholder imo. Baker is a wildcard and I don't like the way he carries himself. He may have talent but who knows what you're going to get both on and off the field and in the locker room. I'll take a less talented, professional adult. 

Edited by Panthers Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't see him in the roster, even if he's outright cut. We didn't learn anything from the Teddy debacle. You can't openly poo all over a guy while he's still on your roster. 😂

TB was different. He’s a proven vet. Everyone basically thinks Darnold is terrible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...