Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers terminating Rock Hill project agreements


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, frankw said:

Well it's funny you mention that bc that's exactly what he did when he made Matt Rhule one of the highest paid NFL coaches with 1 year of low level assistant coaching experience.

he agreed to pay rhule the money. he didn't agree to whatever is going on in rock hill.

Edited by demcj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Reports were York County did. 

once this thing officially blows up we should start to get some clarification on some things and what actually went on.  I don’t think the full truth of all the talks is on the table yet.  It will be once there is officially no chance in it being saved 

Unless it goes the other direction and they complete it.  In that case, everyone will be trying to make nice and paper over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, poundaway said:

Unless it goes the other direction and they complete it.  In that case, everyone will be trying to make nice and paper over it.

Yeah, people keep acting like we have the facts.  We haven’t because the hope of completing the project always existed and you can’t lay it all out there that being the case.   The facts on both sides won’t really come out until there is no hope of salvaging it.  Then it comes out.   Which we look to be nearing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tbe said:


Rock Hill still agreed to pay. They signed a contract. They did it because they wanted the HQ in their town instead of CLT or somewhere else. Giving the money was their only way to attract this project.

They made a promise to build the (public) roads leading to the HQ and then couldn’t follow through. Completely on them.

 

Tepper knowingly and intentionally entered this deal with a city that everyone knew could face some hiccups/issues in regards to the project.  Was talked about before it ever started.    

and we don’t know the facts and talks yet between both parties.  It’s silly to go all in on a side being right/wrong IMO right now.  I suspect both will rightfully look bad in the end. 
 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tbe said:


Rock Hill still agreed to pay. They signed a contract. They did it because they wanted the HQ in their town instead of CLT or somewhere else. Giving the money was their only way to attract this project.

They made a promise to build the (public) roads leading to the HQ and then couldn’t follow through. Completely on them.

We'll be hearing more about this. The optics for the moment are what they are. Tepper with another L after taking his ball and going home. Just prepare for the very real possibility of seeing more of that.

  • Pie 3
  • The D 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yeah, people keep acting like we have the facts.  We haven’t because the hope of completing the project always existed and you can’t lay it all out there that being the case.   The facts on both sides won’t really come out until there is no hope of salvaging it.  Then it comes out.   Which we look to be nearing. 

You are awfully selective on when we "have the facts."  Dude, you talk a lot of stuff that you don't "have the facts"  because we hear stuff through news and twitter.  We never have all the facts, we always form an opinion on the limited knowledge we have.  🙄

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, poundaway said:

You are awfully selective on when we "have the facts."  Dude, you talk a lot of stuff that you don't "have the facts"  because we hear stuff through news and twitter.  We never have all the facts, we always form an opinion on the limited knowledge we have.  🙄

Huh? That’s not selective.  That’s just life/people.  

when this blows up officially….we get more info.  Because the hopes of completing it is gone from the equation. 

The safe bet is both sides look pretty bad in the end.  That ain’t radical or bias.   Some folks jumping way too quick on the it is ALL Rock Hill to blame and none to Tepper bandwagon. 

we still know very little.  Later we will know more.  It is what it is.  Seems knowing more would put us in better position to take a stand on this topic.   

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...