Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer and Morgan draft presser today at 2:00

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Pardon me for not believing some dude named cecil that has a radio show in denver.  God bless you if thats your thing but common sense should prevail here

What about the rap sheet? I think others reported it well, maybe they repeated the first report tho...

Who am I to know, I have learned no matter what- people will believe what they want regardless of facts, evidence, and logic. Goodluck!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Basbear said:

What about the rap sheet? I think others reported it well, maybe they repeated the first report tho...

Who am I to know, I have learned no matter what- people will believe what they want regardless of facts, evidence, and logic. Goodluck!

Nobody else reported the niners offered a first for darnold.  The jets would have accepted in a second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Here is what I heard because I read tea leaves.

1. "You have to ask (referring to veteran QBs) why are they still out there?"  Vet QB ONLY if we cannot draft one.

2. "Draft is deep at OL"  We could be looking at BC to LOT if a QB is there after a trade back.  This could be for a G/C.

3. They deliberately did not mention LTs but they did mention QBs (2 being good with---how hard is it to figure out which 2?)  This reeked of smokescreen to me. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthering Mentor

Panthering

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Here is what I heard because I read tea leaves.

1. "You have to ask (referring to veteran QBs) why are they still out there?"  Vet QB ONLY if we cannot draft one.

2. "Draft is deep at OL"  We could be looking at BC to LOT if a QB is there after a trade back.  This could be for a G/C.

3. They deliberately did not mention LTs but they did mention QBs (2 being good with---how hard is it to figure out which 2?)  This reeked of smokescreen to me. 

 

Regarding 3, I think for many here worst case scenario is the top 3 LT's are off the board at 6 and there's not a trade back option. Would people agree with that?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Panthering said:

Regarding 3, I think for many here worst case scenario is the top 3 LT's are off the board at 6 and there's not a trade back option. Would people agree with that?

Yes, I see that. 

Watching more today--Ian Rappaport suggested that the Ravens (14) and Eagles (15, 18) are potential trading partners.

Based on what Fitterer said about trading back into the "teens", I have to think this is a possibility.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By strato · Posted

      Would you just fuging quit trying to make us like him? That is his job, not yours.  Thank you. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Rookie season being key to uour argument. I didn't at all mislead about the talent Cam had to work with. Kalil was a great center. Olsen was a great TE. Our WRs were probably the worst in the league. Cam still won MVP, we went 15-1, and we went to the SB. Your attempt to bring up Cam to defend Bryce is desperate and clownish. Bryce has more talent to work with and has done WAY less.
    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      Not exactly sure that is an honest assesment of the talent he had to work with that year. Olsen had over 1100 yards that season making the PB, Stewart had close to 1100 total yards also going to the PB. He had Kalil at C who went to the PB, Trai Turner at RG who also went to the PB, and Michael Oher at LT who played well enough that the Panthers offered him a new contract the following year. I wouldn't call that a trash OL. He also played with a defense that was stacked with talent as well.   "The thing we are doing better this time around is actually surrounding our #1 overall draft pick QB with talent vs. asking him to completely carry the offense. I just hope that effort is leading us to realize that the guy isn't even good enough to get carried." Please.... Did you not read the list of names Newton had to work with his rookie season. I guess you missed it so I will post it again for you... Steve Smith (PB), Greg Olsen (PB), Brandon LaFell, Ted Ginn JR, Deangelo Williams (PB), Jonathan Stewart (PB), Jordan Grossn (PB), Ryan Kalil (PB) on the offensive side and then he had Luke Kuechly (PB), Jon Beason (PB), Thomas Davis (PB), Star Lotulelei, Kawann Short ( PB ),Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy (PB ), Mike Mitchell, Josh Norman (PB)  For comparison, here is who Young had his first year.  Chuba Hubbard, DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Adam Thielen, Hayden Hurst, Ikem Ekwonu, Chandler Zavala, Bradley Bozeman, Nash Jensen and Taylor Morton. Not a single PB player on the list and most of them aren't even playing any longer. Additionally, his HC was fired during the season and the defense was as bad as the offense.  You might not like the comparison but saying Newton had to completely carry the offense isn't exactly fair to the 4 pro bowlers on offense who played with him that year.
×
×
  • Create New...