Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we not get a pick from green bay for robby?


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Shocker said:

It would take some serious mind games to think Robbie is worth more than a 4th rounder 

A 4th sounds about right. We can package our 4ths to jump back into the 3rd. Gets rid of Robbie in case we trade for Baker and GB is in need of some speed at the WR position. Rodgers would keep him in check throughout the season. It makes a lot of sense really. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Green Bay just added Sammy Watkins.  They just checked the Robby Anderson box with that. 

Plus, this draft leans WR too.  So why not just draft a cheap kid that runs fast.  9 WRs run a 4.3 in this draft.  9 more run a 4.4. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the current market for wide receivers and possible future contracts well over 100 million dollars you can safely assume most teams will be looking to the draft if they want a wideout. The people who hate Robby might as well get comfortable it's gonna be awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Yeah but what are they going to do at WR for the other 14 games in the season?

18 kids in this draft run at least a 4.4.  Rookie's put up Robby Anderson numbers pretty often.   I just don't see why in this draft you would trade for Robby before or during the draft with all that out there.   You might could deal him after the draft. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...