Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we not get a pick from green bay for robby?


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Shocker said:

It would take some serious mind games to think Robbie is worth more than a 4th rounder 

A 4th sounds about right. We can package our 4ths to jump back into the 3rd. Gets rid of Robbie in case we trade for Baker and GB is in need of some speed at the WR position. Rodgers would keep him in check throughout the season. It makes a lot of sense really. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Green Bay just added Sammy Watkins.  They just checked the Robby Anderson box with that. 

Plus, this draft leans WR too.  So why not just draft a cheap kid that runs fast.  9 WRs run a 4.3 in this draft.  9 more run a 4.4. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the current market for wide receivers and possible future contracts well over 100 million dollars you can safely assume most teams will be looking to the draft if they want a wideout. The people who hate Robby might as well get comfortable it's gonna be awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Yeah but what are they going to do at WR for the other 14 games in the season?

18 kids in this draft run at least a 4.4.  Rookie's put up Robby Anderson numbers pretty often.   I just don't see why in this draft you would trade for Robby before or during the draft with all that out there.   You might could deal him after the draft. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...