Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who could we trade to get back in draft?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, frankw said:

If you're moving up Robby Anderson isn't even in the conversation. You better prepare to part with a young talented defensive player. I don't see how we can move CMC with the cap ramifications and we've already restructured his deal twice.

A young, cheap, talented defender for a 2nd round pick? Doubtful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

It’s too early to give up on him

Sad thing is if he had of been drafted late first or early second a lot of people wouldn’t be so hard on him. 
But he is a top 10 pick and that comes with certain expectations. So far he hasn’t really fulfilled any of them. 
He was overdrafted, but that wasn’t his fault.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Smithers said:

Brown just brought in a 1st somehow.  I think Robby and our 4th could fetch a mid round 2nd

Yeah. By comparison RA is now on a pretty friendly deal if he can perform at 2020 level. Could possibly blame the lack of productivity on Darnold. RA has value and pair him with a pick and I bet we could get back into the 2nd round. 
 

Also as an aside….Fitterer is a genius simply for anticipating market and getting the DJ deal done. Absolutely genius move. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

Good or bad Fitterer will be looking at all scenarios to get us back in. I will be shocked if he actually sits around until the fourth.

Idk…I think it depends on who’s available and where and the price. If Willis, Ridder, Howell all come off the board in the first 7-8 picks of the 2nd round idk if it’s feasible to get back in. I wouldn’t trade a young, starting defender for that value unless I KNEW the QB was a significant upgrade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robbie makes the most sense and given the run on WRs yesterday and the WR trades, he may have more trade value than I would've thought. If I was Fitts I'd consider reaching out to his agent and telling Robbie to purge his Twitter account of all the dumb poo he constantly says because we're gonna see if KC or GB has interest. Wouldn't he want to go play with an elite QB for once?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Idk…I think it depends on who’s available and where and the price. If Willis, Ridder, Howell all come off the board in the first 7-8 picks of the 2nd round idk if it’s feasible to get back in. I wouldn’t trade a young, starting defender for that value unless I KNEW the QB was a significant upgrade. 

Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...