Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 3 Pick 94: Panthers Select Matt Corral - QB Ole Miss

Ricky Spanish

By Ricky Spanish,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Our third is likely to be a top 5-10 in the 2023 draft. Why trade that? Why? For Corral? Is he better than Howell? Is he better than Strong? Is he better enough to be a starting QB in the NFL? If the answer to a single one of those questions is no, then it is a dumb trade. 

Just fuging wait or trade a goddamn 4th for another 4th. Don't let go of 1st-3rd round draft picks. That is the meat of the draft.

You seem wound up. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Our third is likely to be a top 5-10 in the 2023 draft. Why trade that? Why? For Corral? Is he better than Howell? Is he better than Strong? Is he better enough to be a starting QB in the NFL? If the answer to a single one of those questions is no, then it is a dumb trade. 

Just fuging wait or trade a goddamn 4th for another 4th. Don't let go of 1st-3rd round draft picks. That is the meat of the draft.

That doesn’t really make any sense. If anyone knew the answer to any of your questions they’d be the highest paid GM in NFL history. Also we won’t be picking top 10 next year 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Matt Rhule doesn’t look happy.  Maybe he is just tired but there does seem to be something.  Also, he said all the best QBs in the NFL are old.  Over the age of 35.  That it’s an older players position WTF? 

Rodgers and Brady were among the best before 35.  They just happen to still be playing lol. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Matt Rhule doesn’t look happy.  Maybe he is just tired but there does seem to be something.  Also, he said all the best QBs in the NFL are old.  Over the age of 35.  That it’s an older players position WTF? 

Rodgers and Brady were among the best before 35.  They just happen to still be playing lol. 

He said “Mister Brady” lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Our third is likely to be a top 5-10 in the 2023 draft. Why trade that? Why? For Corral? Is he better than Howell? Is he better than Strong? Is he better enough to be a starting QB in the NFL? If the answer to a single one of those questions is no, then it is a dumb trade. 

Just fuging wait or trade a goddamn 4th for another 4th. Don't let go of 1st-3rd round draft picks. That is the meat of the draft.

It’s a future 3rd rounder for a young QB with potential. We come out if this draft addressing two of our biggest needs with really only our first and what might as well be a fifth round pick and all we did is lose next year’s 3rd over it. That’s minimal damage all things considered. At worse we have a backup with potential on a cheap 3rd round contract. At best we have our new QB. Very low risk high reward pick. Even if it’s a high 3rd next year, those picks are far from sure things. Who was ours last year? Marshall and BC? Marshall might have been a 2nd…

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

 

Rhule, attempting to set expectations that Corral is unlikely to unseat Darnold as the starter: "This is the only position in professional sports where the best players are over the age of 35"

He only mentions Rogers and Brady.

I'm not sure how old Stafford or Russ is, but he doesn't mention Mahomes, Herbert, Burrow, Allen, Lamar, Kyler, Dak...

Edited by trueblade
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

Matt Rhule doesn’t look happy.  Maybe he is just tired but there does seem to be something.  Also, he said all the best QBs in the NFL are old.  Over the age of 35.  That it’s an older players position WTF? 

Rodgers and Brady were among the best before 35.  They just happen to still be playing lol. 

He should really not talk to media anymore, probably not players either

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I dont understand this "Rhule develop the QB" notion. The QB coach and OC develop the quarterback. Thats what they get paid to do. Sean McDermott didnt develop Josh Allen, Ken Dorsey did. BB didnt develop Macjones/Jimmy G ... Mcdaniels did.  

He was saying Rhule has full roster control and is on the hot seat. If fans start booing when Darnold starts struggling, Rhule may try to force Corral in the lineup too early. McAdoo even said it’s ultimately up to Rhule when asked if Sam was his starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, trueblade said:

Rhule, attempting to set expectations that Corral is unlikely to unseat Darnold as the starter: "This is the only position in professional sports where the best players are over the age of 35"

He only mentions Rogers and Brady. I'm not sure how old Stafford or Russ is.

Doesn't mention Mahomes, Herbert, Burrow, Allen, Lamar, Kyler, Dak...

Brady, Rodgers, Brees were all tops in the league in theirs 20s too.   Same for Wilson who isn’t over 35.  That’s was just a weird narrative that QBs somehow don’t get good until retirement age.  

Also doesn’t mention Watson who they just tried to trade the farm for.  

I don’t think Rhule wanted to draft a QB.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
John_Sutter Collaborator

John_Sutter

Posted
Posted

Just watched the edited game against Tennessee (the 30 rush game). It was not a great showing for him, but among some bad throws, a lot of drops from his receivers, and struggles against the blitz in the 2H, his tools and mentality are apparent. He’s not afraid of anybody on the field. He takes hit after hit in that game and does whatever he can to extend the play without taking sacks. And his release is as quick as advertised. 
 

My goodness that Ole Miss offense is annoying to watch, but it’s probably not a bad idea for McAdoo to work some RPO into the offense on occasion as it will help Ickey ease into NFL pass pro, as well. 
 

Highly recommend watching a non-highlight video of Corral without commentary to form your own opinion. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...