Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 3 Pick 94: Panthers Select Matt Corral - QB Ole Miss


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I’m not reading through 35 pages. Most posts have been positive, as they should, but honestly not surprised some of you morons don’t like the pick. 
 

He was one of the last picks of the third round. Complete low risk/high reward move. It really shouldn’t be that hard to figure out. 

Those people seem to be convinced Corral’s ceiling is a high end backup before he has a chance to play. 
I will wait till he plays before I make any decision. We’ll likely see a lot of him, and Darnold, in the preseason. Should be a really fun camp. 

I hope he develops into a franchise QB. But I hope that for all of our starting QBs, yes even Darnold. 
 

I just hope the team doesn’t panic and force him out they’re till he is ready. I can stand another season if Darnold if there is hope for the future behind him. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Our staff had a day one grade on him. They are expecting more than a backup out of him.  I’m not saying they are right, but I expect him to replace Sam before the season is over because Sam might not even be a solid backup.

Kid is light, and doesn't know the system.  If he has to play this season, it probably won't be good. I know your in the anybody but Sam, camp. So therefore logic doesn't exist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherclaw said:

Kid is light, and doesn't know the system.  If he has to play this season, it probably won't be good. I know your in the anybody but Sam, camp. So therefore logic doesn't exist. 

Kid is always going to be light.  And if he learns the system then hell yeah throw him out there.  If not we are probably drafting top 5ish again next year because we had to start Darnold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Kid is light, and doesn't know the system.  If he has to play this season, it probably won't be good. I know your in the anybody but Sam, camp. So therefore logic doesn't exist. 

I think Sam starts the first half and Corral comes in once we are eliminated from the playoffs. 
Also most if not all rookie QBs don’t know the system. They have to learn it or coaches run a simplified version through their first few games. 

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/30/2022 at 8:26 AM, mrcompletely11 said:

With the way the qbs were falling I have to agree with you,  seems like a panic desperation move when all we had to do was wait and be patient today

waiting until the end of the third round is not patience? 
Wouldn't drafting a QB in round 1 have been a "panic desperation move?" 

I completely disagree with your take on this.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sucks we had to give up next year' 3rd for him, other than that, I'm okay with this flier pick.   Yes, a 3rd round QB pick is a flier unless you drafted him to be a backup.  As a starter...complete flier pick. *Russell Wilson argument incoming*.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It sucks we had to give up next year' 3rd for him, other than that, I'm okay with this flier pick.   Yes, a 3rd round QB pick is a flier unless you drafted him to be a backup.  As a starter...complete flier pick. *Russell Wilson argument incoming*.

Basically, doing nothing was not an option, and if Corral has a 30% chance of becoming a starting QB, do you do it?  I do---the floor is a backup QB--so the cost is minimal, while the payoff is very much higher than what they paid.  I am OK with that.  I was starting to get pissed that they were not moving up for the QBs in the third round--not sure which I liked hte most, but I kinda wanted Willis.  However, I see Corral's upside.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Basically, doing nothing was not an option, and if Corral has a 30% chance of becoming a starting QB, do you do it?  I do---the floor is a backup QB--so the cost is minimal, while the payoff is very much higher than what they paid.  I am OK with that.  I was starting to get pissed that they were not moving up for the QBs in the third round--not sure which I liked hte most, but I kinda wanted Willis.  However, I see Corral's upside.

Corral was the QB I like the most in the mid-rounds.  As long as we didn't take him (or any other QB) at #6, I was fine with that...provided we didn't give up the farm to move back into day 2.  I imagine Fitts will move back next year the the first or second round to recoup that pick.  At the very least we have a successor to PJ Walker beyond this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It sucks we had to give up next year' 3rd for him, other than that, I'm okay with this flier pick.   Yes, a 3rd round QB pick is a flier unless you drafted him to be a backup.  As a starter...complete flier pick. *Russell Wilson argument incoming*.

If he ends up being good I don’t think anyone will complain about the 3rd pick. I do not think he will be shoved out there. He will be allowed to develop. Which probably means Rhule is back next year even if we only win 5 games again, unfortunately. 
I completely disagree with you, 3rd round pick for a low risk/high reward QB is good. 
There is one guarantee that will happen each draft for QBs the team that drafts them will have fans that complain that the player was drafted too high and not worth the pick. 
It is guaranteed like the sunrise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

If he ends up being good I don’t think anyone will complain about the 3rd pick. I do not think he will be shoved out there. He will be allowed to develop. Which probably means Rhule is back next year even if we only win 5 games again, unfortunately. 
I completely disagree with you, 3rd round pick for a low risk/high reward QB is good. 
There is one guarantee that will happen each draft for QBs the team that drafts them will have fans that complain that the player was drafted too high and not worth the pick. 
It is guaranteed like the sunrise. 

We win only 5 games next year Rhule is gone and we are drafting a qb in the top 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

If he ends up being good I don’t think anyone will complain about the 3rd pick. I do not think he will be shoved out there. He will be allowed to develop. Which probably means Rhule is back next year even if we only win 5 games again, unfortunately. 
I completely disagree with you, 3rd round pick for a low risk/high reward QB is good. 
There is one guarantee that will happen each draft for QBs the team that drafts them will have fans that complain that the player was drafted too high and not worth the pick. 
It is guaranteed like the sunrise. 

I'm not saying he wasn't worth the pick, what I am saying is that those thinking he will develop into our franchise QB probably will be let down.  If Corral at minimum turns into a solid QB2, then it's worth the 3rd rounder.  I'm just not holding my breath he'll ever be a legit QB1.  Remember, Will Grier also had his own Huddle groupies after he was drafted thinking with development Will would eventually be starting caliber.  That experiment was short lived.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...