Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport says it could have been Pickett


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Panthro said Willis was the top quarterback on our board.

Pretty much every other source says it was Corral.

Corral was at the top.

All good.  

If Ian was accurate then they would have taken their #2/#3 if it was pickett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I'll just say I've heard enough from Panthro to not doubt what he says. 

Now as far as Corrall vs. Willis vs. Pickett, it could be that the board was evolving and in flux throughout the process. 

Possible.

Said earlier that the team board and what Matt Rhule wanted may not have matched up.

(also factoring in Tepper's affinity for Pickett)

2 minutes ago, Panthro said:

If Ian was accurate then they would have taken their #2/#3 if it was pickett

See above.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Verge said:

It would have been Pickett or Penning for sure. Assuming the other tackles were gone too, which I guess was never going to happen as some expected. I highly doubt they would have taken Pickett over Neal or Cross, that is just not true lol

If the Tackles all went we would have had better trade down packages where taking those other players would make sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

I trust Panthro.  He has shared many things over the years well before they happened.

That, and John Ellis also reported last night or this morning that Corral was the #1 QB on our board.

This is BS.

This is BS and Corral being the #1 QB on our board is too 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Panthro said Willis was the top quarterback on our board.

Pretty much every other source says it was Corral.

If they woulda been successful in trading up earlier before the Colts took Willis, I firmly believe he would've been the pick but the team didn't want to give up much to move. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not a Bryce hater and I would 100% move on.  Especially looking at how the upcoming qb draft looks on paper.  Hopefully he continues to improve but if in 3 seasons you're still chasing average season numbers then he's not going to be the guy.  You've just got to keep taking swings until you hit.  Average qbs without any elite physical traits cant get it done anymore.  So this year Hopefully he continues to develop and is above average statistically.
    • Meltdowns???? He was pulled by Canales because he wasn't executing the game plan after 2 games into the season so he could watch Dalton execute the offense and show Bryce the windows available in the NFL, how to push the ball down the field and how to step up and move around when blitzed. When Young came back 5 games later he clearly watched and improved. Enough he was named the future starter. He doesn't have a history of  meltdowns nor is there any reason to assume he will have one. From what I have read he is mentally strong and emotional stable. He may have bad games down the road, everyone does. But this is all a learning experience for him and so far he seems to be making progress. I can understand being hesitant on anything Panthers, but Young has surprisingly been able to gain his confidence after a disastrous start. You aren't alone in being cautious but I think he is the future. I thought he was too small and too short to succeed in the NFL. Honestly I was pleasantly surprised last year and am optimistic about the offense for the first time since Wilks and Dalton were decent.
    • The Rams wanted to trade up for Williams who they ended up within the end. They even told him that when they called him to let him know he is the pick. The other teams are only an assumption. Like the Cowboys, who took a guard. The truth is the team wanted to trade down first and foremost but couldn't get an offer the were happy with. They took McMillan because they felt he was bpa at 8 plain and simple. 
×
×
  • Create New...