Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 2022 Quarterback Slide


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CRA said:

the 2023 QB picture is going to look a lot different next April than it does today. 

Just look at who was projected to win the Heisman at the start of last season.   

No argument. I was more looking at who the teams are that might be targeting QBs early. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Darknight said:

If you think about this logically, that's the only thing that make sense. They are basically saying this season is a wash without actually saying it. Drew Locke? Really?

I may be hard to believe but that is the only thing that make sense to me. They are getting their QB next year.

It's called the silent tank.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Here's who PFF is thinking will draft one early next year.

 

McKee is a bit unexpected.  He needs to make a major leap even with his upside.  6'6 230, sure, but 15 tds and leading Stanford to what like 3-10 does not compute for a top prospect.  

Will be SUPER interested to see who pops from the Levis/Haener/McCall/Richardson/Van Dyke crowd.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

McKee is a bit unexpected.  He needs to make a major leap even with his upside.  6'6 230, sure, but 15 tds and leading Stanford to what like 3-10 does not compute for a top prospect.  

Will be SUPER interested to see who pops from the Levis/Haener/McCall/Richardson/Van Dyke crowd.

Van Duke and McCall to me are the most interesting past cj and Bryce.  Also the kid from Florida is getting major pub

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

McKee is a bit unexpected.  He needs to make a major leap even with his upside.  6'6 230, sure, but 15 tds and leading Stanford to what like 3-10 does not compute for a top prospect.  

Will be SUPER interested to see who pops from the Levis/Haener/McCall/Richardson/Van Dyke crowd.

that's weird mock.  I bet 3 cents a Clemson defensive lineman goes in the top 10 too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Darknight said:

If you think about this logically, that's the only thing that make sense. They are basically saying this season is a wash without actually saying it. Drew Locke? Really?

I may be hard to believe but that is the only thing that make sense to me. They are getting their QB next year.

Signs point to this being Carrols last season. They will let the new coach draft his QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Van Duke and McCall to me are the most interesting past cj and Bryce.  Also the kid from Florida is getting major pub

Richardson and Levis have my eye as well.  Those two along with Van Dyke and McCall could definitely have the catapult.  We're talking size, speed, passers, a lot less red flags than this year's class.

Haener is a wildcard for me.  He's a bit shorter but he throws some absolute dimes and has led a lot of comeback wins.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

In a nutshell it ain't pretty for successful qbs past 2nd

Situations matter too. High picks typically go to bad teams. Later picks typically go to better teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I do think think anyone is actively rooting against him. Okay, maybe some. But Bryce seems like a really good dude. I don't see you anyone could view the person negatively. But this ain't about that. This is about whether or not we truly think we can compete for SBs with Bryce Young at QB. I don't. Especially if you give him a legit starting QB contract.
    • Bryce had a good playoff game but Taylor Heinicke has had a good playoff game too.  He's improved but calling him the best deep ball thrower in the league is just laughable.
    • You are overgeneralizing talking about every Panther WR that didn't make it. Calling the guy an idiot is lazy and assuming. And I said it wasn't worth bringing up real points because people like you would be lazy and generalize like a scorned woman. Thanks for not disappointing.  He and Coker came into the league the same year. Who was producing in the Seattle game when we passed for 54yds? That's not excuses, but facts. In the playoff game, he smoked a corner off the line of scrimmage just like the Atlanta game and Bryce didn't go to him. I don't consider it an excuse if the QB doesn't look your way or limits your opportunities. Like I said earlier, TMac and Coker are better at making chicken salad out of chicken shite. Don't act like you haven't seen the passes thrown that require extreme contortion or athleticism like jumping five feet in the air to catch. Also, they said in the video he could stand to get closer with Bryce. TMac and Coker have better relationships on and off the field with Bryce. That matters, anyone who has played sports knows that. I said he needs to hear Cam and that means strengthening the relationship with the QB your organization has now. 
×
×
  • Create New...