Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Jimmy G still be on the table?

FuFuLamePoo

By FuFuLamePoo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, frankw said:

He's not that big of an upgrade

Jimmy G yards passing: 3810, 20 TDs, QBR 53, PR 98.7
Sam D   yards passing    2527,  9TDs, QBR 33.2, PR 71.9

Its night and day.

Jimmy has been to the SB and the conference championship two times over the last 3 years.

I agree we shouldn't give up the store, but Sam to JimmyG is the definition of a big upgrade.
 

   
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Jimmy G yards passing: 3810, 20 TDs, QBR 53, PR 98.7
Sam D   yards passing    2527,  9TDs, QBR 33.2, PR 71.9

Its night and day.

Jimmy has been to the SB and the conference championship two times over the last 3 years.

I agree we shouldn't give up the store, but Sam to JimmyG is the definition of a big upgrade.
 

   

The most recent sight of Jimmy G was him throwing a very ill advised pass to the other team and squashing his own teams postseason hopes. Keep in mind that is with a very solid Niners roster. We can get that level of mediocre without giving up more draft picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaNCSU Proficient

CarolinaNCSU

Posted
Posted

If he came essentially free and didn't mess our cap situation up that much, sure. But doubt that's going to happen. 

Rather watch Darnold the first few weeks, see him poo the bed, and then toss Corral in to see what he's got. Would be nice to let Corral sit and learn, but I'm also not a fan of not seeing him for multiple games this year to see if there's anything there or not. Good chance we go into the 2023 draft with QB still as a need. If Corral can prove otherwise, let him. Would rather not go into next offseason wondering what Corral has. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Two things HAVE to happen first.

1) Jimmy G becomes a free agent 

2) Sammy and his contract disappear.

Neirher one of these are likely to happen and the chances of both of them happening are pretty much nil.

Technically three, with the third being that San Francisco has to become comfortable with the idea of Trey Lance as their starter.

There's been some chatter that's not especially close to happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Technically three, with the third being that San Francisco has to become comfortable with the idea of Trey Lance as their starter.

There's been some chatter that's not especially close to happening.

Yes. No way Jimmy G hits FA unless they feel confident Trey is ok....which seems not to be the case.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, tecc86 said:

If the reports about the 49ers not being impressed with Trey Lances development so far I wouldn't be surprised to see them keep Jimmy for another year.

Ditto Baker in Cleveland because Mr. Whip-It-Out could miss the entire season...

...again 🤦‍♂️.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, poundaway said:
9 hours ago, frankw said:

He's not that big of an upgrade

Jimmy G yards passing: 3810, 20 TDs, QBR 53, PR 98.7
Sam D   yards passing    2527,  9TDs, QBR 33.2, PR 71.9

Its night and day.

Jimmy has been to the SB and the conference championship two times over the last 3 years.

I agree we shouldn't give up the store, but Sam to JimmyG is the definition of a big upgrade.

MASSIVE upgrade.  

Super solid guy too...

...always represents the franchise well.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

The most recent sight of Mahomes was an interception squashing his own team's postseason hopes. 

 

Just now, Pakmeng said:

Mahomes threw 3 in his loss to Jimmy Gs 1.

Keep in mind that was Jimmy Gs first ever loss to the Rams.

Well why waste our time with Jimmy why don't we call up KC and see what they want for the INT machine Mahomes? 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...