Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Rhule really think he has 5 years?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

Guaranteed it's a closer representation to you and I would be willing to put money on it. I can dig up random nerds on Google as well but I will just ask again... When are you posting up pics of yourself "bro"?  It might take you a bit to respond today as I'm sure you are bench pressing at the gym right after you drag race your Lambo around your mansion grounds. Don't let us bother you though Hercules. 

 

This you bro?

silence of the lambs GIF

 

 

hey at the end of the day im just on a message board talking poo.  its fun. I don't claim to be Mr. Awesome

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

Maybe Ron did inherit a slightly better mess.  That’s not really the point.  Singling out Ron.  . Capers, Fox and Ron all inherited comparable messes…..and weren’t jokes at the conclusion of year 2.   There was something being built.  Direction.  Improvement.   Belief.  

and I do agree that Rhule wouldn’t be married into a mindset like a Spurrier, Kelly, etc.   I mean there innovation is what got them the jobs though and to see them give it a whirl at the next level.    So I don’t think they compare well to Rhule. 

But it just brings me back to what are waiting on Rhule to show at this level?  What’s the NFL equivalent of his college success?   

I'm not so sure Rhule didn't approach last year to married to a mindset of his "program/system."  One would hope the results (or lack thereof) would have opened his mind a bit, but the jury is still out on that, too.

I'm not looking for or expecting a run to the NFCC this year.  I think 2021's regression killed any realistic expectations of a deep playoff run.  My own expectation is we show respectability.  I'm not putting a hard number of wins on that, but more than 5.  We have to show we can get to the next level, which is somewhere around .500 and not causing laughter when somebody points out we are mathematically in the playoff picture around Thanksgiving. 

Last year we were 5-6 at Thanksgiving, and technically in the playoff hunt.  But the ER's probably treated more people for swallowing bones when that was said as they did people making "strategic errors" trying to deep fry their turkey.  Hopefully we don't send people to the ER choking this year until Christmas.

In other words, my bar for this year is we achieve what we should have achieved last year.  If Rhule can't do that, then I think the NFL is just not his gig. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CRA said:

No, this is just you making up a bad take and projecting it out…..because you have chosen to take a stand on a bad hill in regards to Rhule.  Capers, Fox and Ron all came into bad situations just like Rhule.   Rhule is only unique in the fact he hasn’t done diddly.  

 

Capers had a Supplemental Draft to go along with getting Collins at pick #2. Capers won with Collins, and lost a lot without him.

 

Fox had a decent team, then found Jake. Fox won a lot with Jake, and not so much without him.

 

Rivera had a decent team for Cam to lead. RR had Cam and had some success until Cam fell apart. No so many wins without him.

 

Rhule had no talent, and no QB. But you think that is the same situation. lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

Maybe Ron did inherit a slightly better mess.  That’s not really the point.  Singling out Ron.  . Capers, Fox and Ron all inherited comparable messes…..and weren’t jokes at the conclusion of year 2.   There was something being built.  Direction.  Improvement.   Belief.  

and I do agree that Rhule wouldn’t be married into a mindset like a Spurrier, Kelly, etc.   I mean there innovation is what got them the jobs though and to see them give it a whirl at the next level.    So I don’t think they compare well to Rhule. 

But it just brings me back to what are waiting on Rhule to show at this level?  What’s the NFL equivalent of his college success?   

The NFL equivalent would be building a team good enough to make the playoffs, but not good enough to beat anyone once they get there. Then he hauls ass to the next program. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Huddler said:

some of yall are trying to compensate for something.. 🤔

 

gotta feel better about yourself somehow i guess.  gotta get that huddle fame baby!! 

You can't be talking about me.  I have an ex-wife and a current wife.  My motto is "I exist therefore I am wrong."

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

16 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Capers had a Supplemental Draft to go along with getting Collins at pick #2. Capers won with Collins, and lost a lot without him.

 

Fox had a decent team, then found Jake. Fox won a lot with Jake, and not so much without him.

 

Rivera had a decent team for Cam to lead. RR had Cam and had some success until Cam fell apart. No so many wins without him.

 

Rhule had no talent, and no QB. But you think that is the same situation. lol

Fox took over a 1-15 Chris Weinke Panthers that was coming off a 15 game losing streak. 


Rhule inherited 

Cam -was talented enough to win 7 games with the worst roster in the NFL.   More importantly, his franchise best leadership to get whatever you wanted up and running.   Rhule opted to kick him to the curb.   

CMC -  best RB in the NFL

DJ Moore - was already sleeping walking to 1000+ yards with no QB play 

plus a bunch of young recently talented guys like Burns, Moton, Samuel, Jackson, Shaq

Offensively, Matt Rhule inherited a better gig than Fox did. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

And some are rewriting history to fit their narrative that Rhule isn't as bad as he has proven himself to be.

Nahh.  Rhule still sucks atm.  You are what your record says you are.  Tepper has decided to give him time to turn it around.  We'll see.  

That doesn't mean RR inherited a similar situation to Rhule.  He just didn't.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

 

Fox took over a 1-15 Chris Weinke Panthers that was coming off a 15 game losing streak. 


Rhule inherited 

Cam -was talented enough to win 7 games with the worst roster in the NFL.   More importantly, his franchise best leadership to get whatever you wanted up and running. 

CMC -  best RB in the NFL

DJ Moore - was already sleeping walking to 1000+ yards with no QB play 

plus a bunch of young recently talented guys like Burns, Moton, Samuel.   

Offensively, Matt Rhule inherited a better gig than Fox did. 

 

 

I said everything I needed to say in my last post. You can rearrange it any way you choose. You usually do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Sometimes a change of scenery works.  It wouldn't be the first time a HC failed his first time out and later went on to success.  

I don't this is the guy. Would prefer to not lean into being the new Browns if we can Rhule. We are already trying to outsuck them as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not especially interested in McAdoo as a head coach.

There'll certainly be candidates this year. Heck, the Packers OC might be one of them again.

Yeah, if we are stuck with existing staff I'd probably rather give Wilks another shot than McAdoo.

Would rather just open it up and let Fitterer and the FO make a hire. At the bare minimum if they fug that up royally, we can just get rid of Fitt and start that process again too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
    • Sorry, but this is a terrible breakdown that doesn't at all show what you're trying to say/project about T-Mac next year, as it leaves out key information that changes everything, it makes the opposite point that you're trying to. Chase missed 5 games that second season after playing all 17 as a rookie (and still saw more targets that second season). Puka it looks like you projected his stats out to a 17 game season (as he only played 11 games), but even still , when you have 160+ targets as a rookie, there isn't really much room to get any more the next year. Waddle saw an increase in yards, and sure, his targets went down, but he played on a team with a better WR that year who saw 170 targets for 1,710 yards during that 2nd season for Waddle... something T-Mac doesn't have to contend with on the same team (280+ targets for their top 2 WRs, if you don't think T-Mac would see more than 122 targets if him and Coker combined for 287, then you're nuts). Then Olave and Wilson both saw an increase of 19 targets in their second season. You basically just laid out the reasoning for why T-Mac should see at least 20 more targets next year, if not more, which would be a solid increase and put him easily into the Top 10 most targeted WR next season.
×
×
  • Create New...