Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

He's in the Cam situation post surgery. How come his shoulder isn't shot? Maybe that's why nobody else came knocking and they're trying to fool the dopey Panthers into shooting themselves in the foot.

He didn't have Cams arm to begin with, and doesn't have Sam or Corrals arm either 100% healthy. He's basically Teddy 2.0 but a yes man to appease Rhule's ego

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

He’s a winner.

Also comports himself well and would excel as the face of the franchise 🤘.

This is exactly why the fans hate this FO. Instead of saying hey, we got the #1QB on our board and the top LT in the draft. Hooray! Let's sell the heck out of some #9 jerseys they're considering throwing tens of millions into the QB hole for an average to below average "starter" with a shoulder. Nobody here cares about Jimmy G, Baker or Sam anymore. How freekin' tone deaf do you have to be as an organization?

 

 

It's Golden Corral time! Let's eat!

 

Screenshot_20220504-141021~2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

He’s a winner.

Also comports himself well and would excel as the face of the franchise 🤘.

Lol you dont trade away a massive draft haul to replace a winner. 

We dont need the leftovers of Jimmy Generic or Baker.

Their teams spent a crazy amount of resources to replace them, that should be a huge red flag, they both suck.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

Lol you dont trade away a massive draft haul to replace a winner. 

We dont need the leftovers of Jimmy Generic or Baker.

Their teams spent a crazy amount of resources to replace them, that should be a huge red flag, they both suck.

You are what your record says you are...

...and the Jimmy-G man is a #winner💥👊.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Bye bye 2023 draft picks.

 

Honestly, say what you will about the decision to go after Baker/Jimmy G but waiting until after the draft to chase them is a smarter move. Price is likely to drop as there will be less overall interest. The only way it could go up is a rash of QB TC injuries.

I maybe wrong, but I think Finessere has already traded away 2 picks in 2023(i know the 3rd is gone). But I believe panthers have bufflaos 7th form the LB aSmith deal from 2 years ago. *Now I member, panthers dont have a 6th due the gilmore trade....so yes 2(3rd&6th) picks already gone......ugh

With the unknown I do wish would feeze using future picks given the coaching deal....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

You are what your record says you are...

...and the Jimmy-G man is a #winner💥👊.

You don’t put great QBs on the trading block. You also don’t trade away 3 1st rounders to replace them. Their head coach is also a “winner” with the same record and he wants to move on from Jimmy. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wonder if Sam and a pick for Jimmy could be in the cards. For SF, it gives them a veteran with loads of game experience to add to their room in case it doesn’t work out. For CAR, it gives them a more reliable option capable of operating the offense they’re attempting to run. Also saves SF $6m to the cap. Both are just one year deals so teams can reevaluate next year.

I’d do that. We all want to see Corral but if he were anywhere near being ready to ply as a rookie he would have gone long before 94

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...