Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

He's in the Cam situation post surgery. How come his shoulder isn't shot? Maybe that's why nobody else came knocking and they're trying to fool the dopey Panthers into shooting themselves in the foot.

He didn't have Cams arm to begin with, and doesn't have Sam or Corrals arm either 100% healthy. He's basically Teddy 2.0 but a yes man to appease Rhule's ego

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

He’s a winner.

Also comports himself well and would excel as the face of the franchise 🤘.

This is exactly why the fans hate this FO. Instead of saying hey, we got the #1QB on our board and the top LT in the draft. Hooray! Let's sell the heck out of some #9 jerseys they're considering throwing tens of millions into the QB hole for an average to below average "starter" with a shoulder. Nobody here cares about Jimmy G, Baker or Sam anymore. How freekin' tone deaf do you have to be as an organization?

 

 

It's Golden Corral time! Let's eat!

 

Screenshot_20220504-141021~2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

He’s a winner.

Also comports himself well and would excel as the face of the franchise 🤘.

Lol you dont trade away a massive draft haul to replace a winner. 

We dont need the leftovers of Jimmy Generic or Baker.

Their teams spent a crazy amount of resources to replace them, that should be a huge red flag, they both suck.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

Lol you dont trade away a massive draft haul to replace a winner. 

We dont need the leftovers of Jimmy Generic or Baker.

Their teams spent a crazy amount of resources to replace them, that should be a huge red flag, they both suck.

You are what your record says you are...

...and the Jimmy-G man is a #winner💥👊.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Bye bye 2023 draft picks.

 

Honestly, say what you will about the decision to go after Baker/Jimmy G but waiting until after the draft to chase them is a smarter move. Price is likely to drop as there will be less overall interest. The only way it could go up is a rash of QB TC injuries.

I maybe wrong, but I think Finessere has already traded away 2 picks in 2023(i know the 3rd is gone). But I believe panthers have bufflaos 7th form the LB aSmith deal from 2 years ago. *Now I member, panthers dont have a 6th due the gilmore trade....so yes 2(3rd&6th) picks already gone......ugh

With the unknown I do wish would feeze using future picks given the coaching deal....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

You are what your record says you are...

...and the Jimmy-G man is a #winner💥👊.

You don’t put great QBs on the trading block. You also don’t trade away 3 1st rounders to replace them. Their head coach is also a “winner” with the same record and he wants to move on from Jimmy. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wonder if Sam and a pick for Jimmy could be in the cards. For SF, it gives them a veteran with loads of game experience to add to their room in case it doesn’t work out. For CAR, it gives them a more reliable option capable of operating the offense they’re attempting to run. Also saves SF $6m to the cap. Both are just one year deals so teams can reevaluate next year.

I’d do that. We all want to see Corral but if he were anywhere near being ready to ply as a rookie he would have gone long before 94

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...