Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah the team has been worse than before under Tepper. I think Tepper still has a chance to be a good owner, but Sizzle logic shows us “you are what your record is.” Guess Jimmy G is the next great QB and so is PJ Walker (never lost), while Tepper is terrible…

No response to any of my posts on this logic, he knows he is in over his head in discussing actual football. It’s almost like he knows nothing about it, and joined the board because he’s a fan of the owner instead of the team or the NFL.

Edited by X-Clown
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure Sizzle is our old friend Sanjay.

Same MO: gets fixated on things (two TE sets, the Appaloosa Model), wants people to think he's smarter, responds as if he's proven something when he obviously hasn't, etc.

I never read the Sanjay guys’ posts, but that sounds terrible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

No response to any of my posts on this logic, he knows he is in over his head in discussing actual football. It’s almost like he knows nothing about it, and joined the board because he’s a fan of the owner instead of the team or the NFL.

What else can he say other than his logic was flawed and stupid? This is also the guy who guaranteed Watson would remain a Texan and Russ wouldn’t be traded…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

👆☝️👆☝️bovine dung of the highest order... 🤣

Why? It didn't happen!? Did we have a winning season in the last four years? Has the historical win percentage gone up or down?

Maybe running things like academia in a professional setting wasn't a great tactical approach to not getting rag dolled by other NFL owners and organizations.

You are a Tepper superfan. I get it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Scroll up and read. Blowhard, bovine dung etc…  They weren’t that crude, just showed you had nothing left in your argument 🤷‍♂️

Just the facts, ma'am... 🥹🤣

PS...only the last 3 seasons accrue to Tepper's ledger 🤙.

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

A...sport.

(was this really a question?) 😳

Triggered?

Pal, the NFL is big business of the highest order...

...the product for sale just happens to be "football"...

...how's your post count looking today?  6-7 hours under your belt?

😎🤣

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...