Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah the team has been worse than before under Tepper. I think Tepper still has a chance to be a good owner, but Sizzle logic shows us “you are what your record is.” Guess Jimmy G is the next great QB and so is PJ Walker (never lost), while Tepper is terrible…

No response to any of my posts on this logic, he knows he is in over his head in discussing actual football. It’s almost like he knows nothing about it, and joined the board because he’s a fan of the owner instead of the team or the NFL.

Edited by X-Clown
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure Sizzle is our old friend Sanjay.

Same MO: gets fixated on things (two TE sets, the Appaloosa Model), wants people to think he's smarter, responds as if he's proven something when he obviously hasn't, etc.

I never read the Sanjay guys’ posts, but that sounds terrible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

No response to any of my posts on this logic, he knows he is in over his head in discussing actual football. It’s almost like he knows nothing about it, and joined the board because he’s a fan of the owner instead of the team or the NFL.

What else can he say other than his logic was flawed and stupid? This is also the guy who guaranteed Watson would remain a Texan and Russ wouldn’t be traded…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

👆☝️👆☝️bovine dung of the highest order... 🤣

Why? It didn't happen!? Did we have a winning season in the last four years? Has the historical win percentage gone up or down?

Maybe running things like academia in a professional setting wasn't a great tactical approach to not getting rag dolled by other NFL owners and organizations.

You are a Tepper superfan. I get it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Scroll up and read. Blowhard, bovine dung etc…  They weren’t that crude, just showed you had nothing left in your argument 🤷‍♂️

Just the facts, ma'am... 🥹🤣

PS...only the last 3 seasons accrue to Tepper's ledger 🤙.

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

A...sport.

(was this really a question?) 😳

Triggered?

Pal, the NFL is big business of the highest order...

...the product for sale just happens to be "football"...

...how's your post count looking today?  6-7 hours under your belt?

😎🤣

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...