Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robby or Robbie Anderson no show OTA’s

slumdogmillionaire
 Share

Recommended Posts

Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Did you forget that you quoted me? I thought so.

 

Some of you folks sure do have a problem when folks don't kowtow to your whims. lol

Did you forget that I actually didn't quote you? Not surprised.

https://www.carolinahuddle.com/topic/177289-robby-or-robbie-anderson-no-show-ota’s/?do=findComment&comment=5830362

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, onmyown said:

he led the league in dropped passes per reception that’s a fact, and that is exactly what I posted, how is this making things up?

you say no no no it was DJ who dropped more! 

but he only dropped one, single pass more with almost twice the receptions

seems to me you’re the one trying to make crap up lol

Dropped passes per reception really doesn't mean anything 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaMan Mentor

PandaMan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Zod said:

He did the same thing last year. It was nothing 

It was nothing until he played like ass all year and said he had his own training regimen when he skipped last season.  Which I get, if it actually worked.  Dude needs all the help he can get with these QBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Is hubby1 related to Robbie?

The dude underperformed, just like Sam. The Huddle gets on a player's case (except for one) if he underperforms. Not sure what the problem is here.

 

See, this is the Huddle in a nutshell. All I said was that Robbie didn't lead the league in drops. (As someone else had said)

 

And It has morphed into this. 

 

Not one of you even asked my opinion of Robbie.

 

Same with Sam. I am a supposed Sam lover. Yet not one person actually asked my opinion on him.

 

Perception, not a Huddle strong suit.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

He never lets the truth get in the way of his BS.

I would think that has more to do with Darnold's inability or the play calling than Robbie's inability to catch passes.

Anderson has had one bad year which also happens to be a pretty bad year in general, and yet some of you want to conveniently forget that fact in order to be decidedly petty. He was pressing in order to make plays. 

If he has a repeat of 2021 in 2022, then your criticisms will have more validity. For now, all it seems like is that some of you have some type of unrighteous axe to grind.

Edited by top dawg
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaLivin Grand Master

CarolinaLivin

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

See, this is the Huddle in a nutshell. All I said was that Robbie didn't lead the league in drops. (As someone else had said)

 

And It has morphed into this. 

 

Not one of you even asked my opinion of Robbie.

 

Same with Sam. I am a supposed Sam lover. Yet not one person actually asked my opinion on him.

 

Perception, not a Huddle strong suit.

 

 

What is your opinion of Sam?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

He never lets the truth get in the way of his BS.

 

Here you are quoting me. On page 3.

 

15 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Did you forget that I actually didn't quote you? Not surprised.

https://www.carolinahuddle.com/topic/177289-robby-or-robbie-anderson-no-show-ota’s/?do=findComment&comment=5830362

 

And here you are denying said fact. One page later. Is your memory shot that badly?

 

"I'm done with this one."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CarolinaLivin said:

What is your opinion of Sam?

 

He pretty much sucks as a QB in the NFL. He is talented athletically. But he is bad at QBingl.

 

I was hopeful a change of scenery would help. But alas, not so much.

 

Hey. Thanks for asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaLivin Grand Master

CarolinaLivin

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

He pretty much sucks as a QB in the NFL. He is talented athletically. But he is bad at QBingl.

 

I was hopeful a change of scenery would help. But alas, not so much.

 

Hey. Thanks for asking.

just curious 

Also (unrelated to the argument above)

What’s your opinion of robby? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Here you are quoting me. On page 3.

 

 

And here you are denying said fact. One page later. Is your memory shot that badly?

 

"I'm done with this one."

Hold on a minute. You quoted me, and I replied to you, and you’re calling me out for quoting you?

Do you ever realize how stupid you are?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Did you...mean......to compliment him...? 🤨

He doesn’t know what the hell he’s doing, and he never has. He’ll quote me on this and then talk poo that I responded. Biggest fuging clown on here. Dude thinks he’s got the upper hand when he’s gonna go down in history as a Robbie Anderson apologist, among numerous other embarrassments. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...