Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Panthers staff not all on same page about acquiring Browns QB Baker Mayfield


Recommended Posts

Why waste any more time and resources on obvious backup trajectory guys trying to relive glory lost? The NFL knows what Baker Mayfield, Gimmy G, and Sam Darnold are, the Browns, 49ers and Jets already spent millions trying to figure that out. Why throw good money after bad? 

Stop the foolishness.

Let's eat!

 

Screenshot_20220504-141021~2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, trueblade said:

To me, the obvious solution/outcome for both the Panthers and the Browns would be a trade of Sam Darnold for Baker Mayfield straight up. The money is a wash for both teams and both teams get a new QB to sell to their fan base. Cleveland simply sells the idea it was our terrible line plus a greenhorn OC that caused Sam's issues and that Darnold will thrive under Stefanski's QB friendly system.

The thing most likely holding it up is the uncertainty around Deshaun Watson's suspension.

I think the Browns feel good about Jacoby Brissett getting them through a six-game Watson suspension. They will want another option if Deshaun is out for longer.

I would take that solution in a heartbeat but I am curious to know if Carolina has even tried to use Darnold. Or if Cleveland just immediately balked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would take that solution in a heartbeat but I am curious to know if Carolina has even tried to use Darnold. Or if Cleveland just immediately balked.

I've heard Darnold get mentioned in a Jimmy G trade.  He would not be a threat to Lance, played football in California and at one time Shanahan was interested in trading with the Jets for him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, trueblade said:

To me, the obvious solution/outcome for both the Panthers and the Browns would be a trade of Sam Darnold for Baker Mayfield straight up. The money is a wash for both teams and both teams get a new QB to sell to their fan base. Cleveland simply sells the idea it was our terrible line plus a greenhorn OC that caused Sam's issues and that Darnold will thrive under Stefanski's QB friendly system.

The thing most likely holding it up is the uncertainty around Deshaun Watson's suspension.

I think the Browns feel good about Jacoby Brissett getting them through a six-game Watson suspension. They will want another option if Deshaun is out for longer.

The Browns can't sell Sam Darnold to the Browns fanbase.  The fanbase are connoiseurs of horrific QB play.   They know Sam Darnold existed before Carolina.  

Sam isn't a starter.  Sam Darnold isn't a backup QB.   Teddy Bridgwater is a backup QB.   Sam Darnold serves no purpose on a NFL roster at this point. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I've heard Darnold get mentioned in a Jimmy G trade.  He would not be a threat to Lance, played football in California and at one time Shanahan was interested in trading with the Jets for him.  

I would assume if he was dangled in the Jimmy G talks that he was in the Baker Mayfield talks, as well. Maybe Andrew Berry literally answers all Scott Fitterers calls, "Hi Scott, we still don't want Sam Darnold. What else did you want to talk about?"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, it must be a slow news time for Mary Kay Cabot. Pushing conjecture and speculation based on month-old news reports. None of this is anything new, not even the painting of the Panthers FO as being not on the same page. Like I said, I can do without it.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

The Browns can't sell Sam Darnold to the Browns fanbase.  The fanbase are connoiseurs of horrific QB play.   They know Sam Darnold existed before Carolina. 

Why would they have to sell fans on a backup qb who's not gonna be on the roster in 2023?

Browns fans are smart enough to know that Darnold is just a means to an end - getting Mayfield out of town.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, djp14 said:

Why would they have to sell fans on a backup qb who's not gonna be on the roster in 2023?

Browns fans are smart enough to know that Darnold is just a means to an end - getting Mayfield out of town.

But why would they rather have Sam over Baker?  I mean, what's the point. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

But why would they rather have Sam over Baker?  I mean, what's the point. 

No distractions for the team.  Sam will pretty much keep his mouth shut and do what the coaches ask him.  Still younger and might do him some good to sit as a backup for a while and try to learn to read defenses better.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

But why would they rather have Sam over Baker?  I mean, what's the point. 

The Browns bridge/relationship with Baker is irreparably damaged. Baker doesn't want to be there and the Browns don't want him there. Sam is just someone new/different to survive the season if Watson gets a long suspension (6+ games).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Soooo...have you heard that the team may be interested in Baker Mayfield?  The building maintenance guy told me he heard it from his brother in Cleveland.

Noooo! What about Sam? I thought it was reported that he was doing really well now with the NFL's leading QB whisperer as the new OC? He's basically a rookie if you factor in the untap potential or so the Panther's bot leads us to believe. 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

No distractions for the team.  Sam will pretty much keep his mouth shut and do what the coaches ask him.  Still younger and might do him some good to sit as a backup for a while and try to learn to read defenses better.  

Lol. I think we can all just jettison the idea of Sam Darnold at this point. He is who he is. He's basically doubled down on what hasn't worked, so he probably has 2-3 years left as an NFL player.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Noooo! What about Sam? I thought it was reported that he was doing really well now with the NFL's leading QB whisperer as the new OC? He's basically a rookie if you factor in the untap potential or so the Panther's bot leads us to believe. 

 

He told me that Sam was on his way out in Carolina. He said the team wasn't going to re-sign him. You heard it here first.

  • The D 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...