Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The only rational for Mayfield


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

The rational is that he is a proven top ten QB with the right support, while being an ahole or whatever he is.

Sam is a proven bust and Corral is a mid round rookie. 

The rational for not getting him is we want to lose, or think we will lose regardless.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baker is not a world beater, but he has done significantly better than Darnold when healthy. He is probably not the long term answer, but if you think you can upgrade for the coming season, you do so. Corral needs to be able to develop slowly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thorrez said:

The rational is that he is a proven top ten QB with the right support, while being an ahole or whatever he is.

Sam is a proven bust and Corral is a mid round rookie. 

The rational for not getting him is we want to lose, or think we will lose regardless.

Baker isnt close to a top 10 QB.

You have to name off guys like Kirk Cousins and Tannehill before thinking about Baker and they are a good ways down the list. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Baker isnt close to a top 10 QB.

You have to name off guys like Kirk Cousins and Tannehill before thinking about Baker and they are a good ways down the list. 

Obviously Baker isn't top 10 but Cousins is above average at best and honestly Tannehill is fuging overrated. People talked so positively of him bc they wanted to latch Darnold onto his improvement as a means of coping with the trade and justifying it since they both had Gase as a head coach.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, frankw said:

Obviously Baker isn't top 10 but Cousins is above average at best and honestly Tannehill is fuging overrated. People talked so positively of him bc they wanted to latch Darnold onto his improvement as a means of coping with the trade and justifying it since they both had Gase as a head coach.

Cousins has consistently put up better numbers than Baker, if he is above average at best, what does that make Baker? 

The dude is a throwaway just liked Teddy B and Darnold.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayfield can be our next Delhomme or our next Rodney Peete... not sure where that fits in on our current situation....but we're in QB purgatory hell...so, herd them in and herd them out.... Less u ridin Golden Corral...which I am...  he can play or he can't go on to 2023...fk it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Cousins has consistently put up better numbers than Baker, if he is above average at best, what does that make Baker? 

The dude is a throwaway just liked Teddy B and Darnold.

We know what Baker is. Better than Darnold but so was Teddy. We could have kept Bridgewater but that's long gone. So who are you hitching your wagon to? You want to talk QB's but I can't ever get a straight answer out of you about who you want. Why straddle the fence? We're in purgatory anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

We know what Baker is. Better than Darnold but so was Teddy. We could have kept Bridgewater but that's long gone. So who are you hitching your wagon to? You want to talk QB's but I can't ever get a straight answer out of you about who you want. Why straddle the fence? We're in purgatory anyway.

Im pretty sure I already said I want to see what Corral has before next years draft, its the only thing that makes sense. 

We already know what Baker, Darnold, Old Cam, Jimmy G etc. can do none of them are our franchise guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Im pretty sure I already said I want to see what Corral has before next years draft, its the only thing that makes sense. 

We already know what Baker, Darnold, Old Cam, Jimmy G etc. can do none of them are our franchise guy. 

Corral getting significant playing time is the only real answer. But I don't trust this staff to handle it properly. Not after that 2 QB system nonsense last year. If they're going to play him then give him a real shot not late in a game after Sam Darnold has been turning the ball over and playing like crap for three quarters.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...