Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sheena Quick on Baker Mayfield to Panthers trade


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Verge said:

I do think Baker is more likely. It really is a fluid situation as I understand it.

I just don't want any part of Jimmy G. Baker probably won't work out either but at least he is young and has real talent and two years ago looked like an up and coming legit QB. There's a chance he would work out.

Jimmy G... there's just nothing there. The only way I would want him is if we're very sold on Corral being the long-term answer and value Jimmy G as a veteran mentor and placeholder. The question is what is that worth on trade compensation and cap hit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Verge said:

I do think Baker is more likely. It really is a fluid situation as I understand it.

I’d prefer Baker because the Browns were awful when he first arrived and he still played decent. I think there is a small chance he can be a franchise guy vs Jimmy who has reached his ceiling. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I just don't want any part of Jimmy G. Baker probably won't work out either but at least he is young and has real talent and two years ago looked like an up and coming legit QB. There's a chance he would work out.

Jimmy G... there's just nothing there. The only way I would want him is if we're very sold on Corral being the long-term answer and value Jimmy G as a veteran mentor and placeholder. The question is what is that worth on trade compensation and cap hit?

It's kind of an "oh poo I am on the hot seat" moment for Matt Rhule, he knows there is no way he can roll into 2022 with Sam, Cam, or a rookie and keep his job. It is poorly timed adjustment for years of QB negligence. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Seems a rookie is his best bet for job security not worst.

Invest in any of the vets they better have a playoff season. With Corall all they have to do is show some potential.

Unless the word is win more games this year or else. Three straight years of 5 or less win seasons for a coach who hasn’t had any success in the NFL should get him fired. If Corral flashes I could see them wanting to get an offensive coach to fully develop him. The Chargers fired their coach after Herbert showed potential and the Browns did the same with Jackson/Kitchen and Baker. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, onmyown said:

Lol…

Well Quick is possibly the worst…whatever you want to call her. She’s been wrong consistently.

But the Huddle doesn't get it.

Tomorrows episode: "Verge" predicts Tom Brady to Carolina.....(Face/Palm}

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Verge said:

It's kind of an "oh poo I am on the hot seat" moment for Matt Rhule, he knows there is no way he can roll into 2022 with Sam, Cam, or a rookie and keep his job. It is poorly timed adjustment for years of QB negligence. 

Is he really on the hot seat though? I mean I get coach/owner speak and most NFL teams and history are set on 3 years, and can only hope that’s all it is when Tepper starts talking about his Rome/Jay-Z/5 year/7 year ‘analytics’, but I got to say there is a more than comfortable part of me that thinks Tepper just may be that stupid…mainly based on observation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to competete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...