Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

sigh....Miles has removed Hornets from his socials


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

Why would the Hornets say they are giving a restricted free agent a max deal already? That makes zero sense since they can just match any offer Miles gets and will want to keep more cap space available for any other free agents they may want to sign.

I like how they're not looking at last season as a success and demanding more before giving out max contracts like fools.

I'd imagine if your boss is the best to ever play the bar must be very very high. I do think LaMelo will get a max from the Hornets. Anybody else?!

Nick Cannon Idk GIF by Nickelodeon at Super Bowl

Miles needs to understand that rich is rich. He'll be rich regardless. Don't nickel and dime happiness and uproot your family for who knows what, who knows where.

He loves Charlotte he's said so. Melo is here. The grass may not be greener for a 6'6" forward.

Edited by rippadonn
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, frankw said:

 

Not surprised that they extended a qualifying offer to Martin but if we bring these two back then the roster will look the same as last years barring a trade.

McDaniels, Richards, and McGowens are all going to be on non-guaranteed contracts so there is a little wiggle room there but if both Bridges and Martin are back then we’re looking at:

G - Ball

G - Rozier, Martin, Bouknight, McGowens

F - Hayward, Oubre, McDaniels

F - Bridges, Washington, Thor, Jones

C - Plumlee, Williams, Richards


I assume McGowens gets a two way deal and maybe Richards gets waived. That will leave two spots open for the MLE and BAE, presumably to pick up another center and point guard. I wouldn’t be totally shocked if they brought back Harrell and Thomas. They’ll also have one more two way slot available as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Not surprised that they extended a qualifying offer to Martin but if we bring these two back then the roster will look the same as last years barring a trade.

McDaniels, Richards, and McGowens are all going to be on non-guaranteed contracts so there is a little wiggle room there but if both Bridges and Martin are back then we’re looking at:

G - Ball

G - Rozier, Martin, Bouknight, McGowens

F - Hayward, Oubre, McDaniels

F - Bridges, Washington, Thor, Jones

C - Plumlee, Williams, Richards


I assume McGowens gets a two way deal and maybe Richards gets waived. That will leave two spots open for the MLE and BAE, presumably to pick up another center and point guard. I wouldn’t be totally shocked if they brought back Harrell and Thomas. They’ll also have one more two way slot available as well.

I can see them bringing Thomas back but not Harrell considering the glut of young bigs that need playing time. I also wouldn't rule out a trade for a backup PG and to get some cap relief. Oubre, Plumlee, Hayward, Rozier, and possibly Bouknight being the most likely to be traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

I can see them bringing Thomas back but not Harrell considering the glut of young bigs that need playing time. I also wouldn't rule out a trade for a backup PG and to get some cap relief. Oubre, Plumlee, Hayward, Rozier, and possibly Bouknight being the most likely to be traded.

Fun thing about Clifford returning is the odds of Kemba coming back just went up significantly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...