Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield is a Carolina Panther


uncfan888
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Why does this staff think it can take other teams qbs and make them good?  This is the 3rd time now that we have gotten a poo qb that has had numerous staffs that couldnt change them.  Where in the fug does rhules confidence come from?  This is insane

Baker is good and has the potential to be great. Why does everyone on here need to be so freaking negative?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I will root for him, and the team will be better this year because of him. But long term I think this hurts. We were free and clear to cut Rhule and Darnold after this season, all the while probably picking top 5. 
 

Baker isn’t the long term answer and now I’m not sure we will find a legitimate one in the draft. 

All blind hope. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rippadonn said:

They will ruin Matt Corral, his desire, confidence. The kid knows he's better than they're treating him.

I didn't want us to trade to Baker, but if all it takes is having Baker on the team in 2022 to "ruin Corral, his desire, confidence", then Corral was never gonna be a franchise guy anyway. Franchise QBs are made of sterner stuff.

I do think having Baker and Sam on the roster will severely slow Corral's development. That's the issue.

Here's my thinking: Rhule really needs to declare a starter before the August 13th game. That's just a little over a month away. August 13th is the second preseason game. That's the "dress rehearsal" game. Ideally, you'd like your starter in place by that point. And I hate to break to you, but Sam is going to look good in training camp. He's a better athlete than Baker--bigger, faster, and stronger. With no pass rush to deal with, he won't hit the panic button you see in live action.

That makes a tough decision for Rhule and the staff. My concern is TC camp reps will get split 50/50 between Sam and Baker in the QB competition. That leaves very few reps for Corral to develop. 

Once the regular season starts, nearly all the reps go to the starter. This again leaves few reps for Corral. 

Now, maybe the "competition" talk is just that, talk and Baker is the guy. Or maybe they move Sam before TC. If that changes, it will change how I feel, but how I feel today can't be based on maybe. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Speaking objectively...

This is a really well administered trade when you look at what we gave up and what we're paying.

Speaking personally...

I'm not a Baker Mayfield fan, but I'll hope for the best.

These are my thoughts on this. 

We have made our QB room better. 

I know this upsets the fans that don't want us to win at all this season, but I don't give a fug for anyone that wants us to lose.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I didn't want us to trade to Baker, but if all it takes is having Baker on the team in 2022 to "ruin Corral, his desire, confidence", then Corral was never gonna be a franchise guy anyway. Franchise QBs are made of sterner stuff.

I do think having Baker and Sam on the roster will severely slow Corral's development. That's the issue.

Here's my thinking: Rhule really needs to declare a starter before the August 13th game. That's just a little over a month away. August 13th is the second preseason game. That's the "dress rehearsal" game. Ideally, you'd like your starter in place by that point. And I hate to break to you, but Sam is going to look good in training camp. He's a better athlete than Baker--bigger, faster, and stronger. With no pass rush to deal with, he won't hit the panic button you see in live action.

That makes a tough decision for Rhule and the staff. My concern is TC camp reps will get split 50/50 between Sam and Baker in the QB competition. That leaves very few reps for Corral to develop. 

Once the regular season starts, nearly all the reps go to the starter. This again leaves few reps for Corral. 

Now, maybe the "competition" talk is just that, talk and Baker is the guy. Or maybe they move Sam before TC. If that changes, it will change how I feel, but how I feel today can't be based on maybe. 

They want to bring him on slowly anyway.. He was a developmental project when we drafted.. Getting 2nd or 3rd QB reps for a full season is what they wanted when they drafted him.. It doesn't hurt his development if it was the plan all along...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I didn't want us to trade to Baker, but if all it takes is having Baker on the team in 2022 to "ruin Corral, his desire, confidence", then Corral was never gonna be a franchise guy anyway. Franchise QBs are made of sterner stuff.

I do think having Baker and Sam on the roster will severely slow Corral's development. That's the issue.

Here's my thinking: Rhule really needs to declare a starter before the August 13th game. That's just a little over a month away. August 13th is the second preseason game. That's the "dress rehearsal" game. Ideally, you'd like your starter in place by that point. And I hate to break to you, but Sam is going to look good in training camp. He's a better athlete than Baker--bigger, faster, and stronger. With no pass rush to deal with, he won't hit the panic button you see in live action.

That makes a tough decision for Rhule and the staff. My concern is TC camp reps will get split 50/50 between Sam and Baker in the QB competition. That leaves very few reps for Corral to develop. 

Once the regular season starts, nearly all the reps go to the starter. This again leaves few reps for Corral. 

Now, maybe the "competition" talk is just that, talk and Baker is the guy. Or maybe they move Sam before TC. If that changes, it will change how I feel, but how I feel today can't be based on maybe. 

You've made my point. Totally agree. There will be few reps for Corral with the starters, nobody grows on the bench. Matt was groomed to be a QB1. He believes it. He wants it. He worked just as hard or maybe harder than Sam and Baker, both failed experiments.

The Browns KNOW Baker is not getting you anywhere. Don't you think THEY hoped and wished for something that just wasn't true? Let's not be delusional. The Jets KNEW Sam would never progress, both are very very flawed. Neither should be playing ahead of Corral as failures. Neither has an ounce of upside left.  What's the message? Be horrible at your job get 19mill? Bad business.

Sam, who sucks and Baker, who sucks were given the opportunity as rookies. Go back to last year and all the pundits were calling for Corral to be a first rounder. What changed? What really changed?

I just think Corral deserves the opportunity. I believe he's much more dynamic, a faster release, a faster thinker/reaction and a better leader of men than both of those failures. Matt Corral can say he lead a team to more wins than they imagined.

Sam? Baker? Losses. They know losing.

The Panthers are too busy taking out the trash for bottom dwellers like the Jets and Browns instead of doing what's best. What's best is putting the past behind us and finally beginning the future at QB. Kicking the can and hooking up another buddy or another buddies boy reeks of good ol' boy non merit based decisions.

Sam always looks good in practice/theory but his stats and success rate are always horrible. Baker is like the Browns have said, too short, too slow, too cocky.

I can't applaud this move. It delays the work that needs to be done NOW. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

These are my thoughts on this. 

We have made our QB room better. 

I know this upsets the fans that don't want us to win at all this season, but I don't give a fug for anyone that wants us to lose.

Marginally better and thats even debatable.

 

I dont want us to lose, I want us to have a plan.  And trading for this dumb dumb on a year contract isnt a plan. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, WOW!! said:

They want to bring him on slowly anyway.. He was a developmental project when we drafted.. Getting 2nd or 3rd QB reps for a full season is what they wanted when they drafted him.. It doesn't hurt his development if it was the plan all along...

Yep. I love how people are acting like Corral was a top 10 pick who is ready to go week one. If he can’t beat out Baker and Sam in training camp, then let him sit and learn. If we have the next great QB in Corral, sitting and waiting won’t hurt him (see Rodgers and Mahomes).

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

It`s so dumb the NFL allowed DBs and LBs to have QB numbers.

Some of those will clear up once we're down to a regular season roster limit.

The Panthers are going to want that settled quickly though. There's jerseys to sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...