Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield is a Carolina Panther


uncfan888
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, rippadonn said:

Matt Corral coming in and doing better than Zach Wilson or as good as Mac Jones saves our franchise and instantly makes our team a winner.

Matt Corral is a man. A man who is a very good QB. Why shouldn't the MAN play football? He played last year. He played QB in offenses before Kiffin. Now with McAdoo. What's the difference?

Matt Corral is better than Sam and Baker off top. Much higher ceiling. The focus should be acclimating him to the offense and preparing Baker and Sam for backup duty, THATS who THEY are.

The future is NOW.

 

Screenshot_20220618-002624~2.png

How do I report SPAM on here?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

I've never argued he was good.

I argued his was the best option for our long term success.

I'll take 10 3 win seasons in a row with a Superbowl over 11 playoff appearances and no Superbowls.

Sam either gets it = win

Doesn't get it and we get a great draft pick and we get to see Matt = Win.

 

Baker is going to be a 9-8 to 11-5 guy and if he does that I see these idiots signing him long term thus putting us in the position of regularly making the playoffs but never getting over the top. ALEX SMITH 3.0

Yeah, never build a team until we miraculously land a top 5 franchise QB!  Great strategy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

I don't know. That is our QB and our team so...

Love it or leave it.

Here Since 2006 

Hello GIF by DJ Khaled

Baker is also our QB on our team right? Listen to your own advice. I like Corral, just spamming the same phrase over and over is annoying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2024 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
×
×
  • Create New...