Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How the Mayfield trade came about


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

From the flipside, and analysis of how the relationship between the Browns and Mayfield broke down...

This writer clearly isn't a Mayfield fan, but he also shines a light on some petty and unprofessional behavior from Stefanski and the Browns.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Raleigh PF said:

Sounds like Tepper was the voice of reason in this whole process.

Wouldn't go that far...

There's more in the article, but the basic gist of it is that he wanted to get Mayfield for as little as possible. (so did Fitterer).

What strikes me the most about how the story went down is that, as has happened a few times before, we were basically only bidding against ourselves.

But this time, instead of raising the price, we actually managed to lower it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

this is kind of funny....

 

Heh 😆

Someone else pointed out that the Browns will be paying both Baker Mayfield and Deshaun Watson for 2022 but may not have either of them.

Andrew Berry it's a lot of praise as a GM but that situation is a mess.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

A drinking game but every time @Mr. Scotitalicizes a word, you take a shot. 

A habit I stole from Stephen King 😆

Can't provide tone of voice in a written format so if you want to emphasize something, you have to use visual cues.

In the case of extended quotes like this one though, it's because the board's quote function on mobile became kind of wonky during a previous software upgrade.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wouldn't go that far...

There's more in the article, but the basic gist of it is that he wanted to get Mayfield for as little as possible. (so did Fitterer).

What strikes me the most about how the story went down is that, as has happened a few times before, we were basically only bidding against ourselves.

But this time, instead of raising the price, we actually managed to lower it.

I got the distinct impression it worked out that way because the rumored other suitor was Seattle.  Had they trotted out somebody else, we might well have had Darnold II, The Sequel. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I got the distinct impression it worked out that way because the rumored other suitor was Seattle.  Had they trotted out somebody else, we might well have had Darnold II, The Sequel. 

Possible. I'd like to think that Scott Fitterer isn't prone to being fooled by these sorts of things like Marty Hurney was though (behind the scenes draft video bolsters that argument).

But yeah, you'd have to think of all people, Fitterer would have a pretty good idea whether his old Seattle colleagues were bluffing or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Possible. I'd like to think that Scott Fitterer isn't prone to being fooled by these sorts of things like Marty Hurney was though (behind the scenes draft video bolsters that argument).

But yeah, you'd have to think of all people, Fitterer would have a pretty good idea whether his old Seattle colleagues were bluffing or not.

Seattle was not interested. Ian Rap shot down Josinas rumors and said Seattle was never interested. No one was besides us. Most teams are hesitant to do any deals w the Browns after the Watson incident and that contract. Then there is us who was willing to give up anything for Watson and when we didn't get him traded for the Watson sweepstakes winner's back up lol.

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...