Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The other top tackles...

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

shaq Mentor

shaq

Posted
Posted

Icky will be our starting LT barring injury week 1. If I’m wrong then fug Rhule really hasn’t learned, I’m guessing Rhule is playing the competition card really heavy rn in attempt to boost our squad let’s see if this works.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Are you suggesting we play Ickey at guard with that statement? He will be the LT week 1. Not sure why there would be any doubt by anyone here.

Then he should be getting as many reps as possible at that spot to lower his learning curve and build chemistry.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

This is the same guy who put in Ervin over BC last year when it was obvious BC was better. Saying he was more of a natural OG. Now BC is getting zero reps at OG and our 1st round pick is playing against back ups. 

 

 

                      🔥 this man!!!!! 

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, shaq said:

Icky will be our starting LT barring injury week 1. If I’m wrong then fug Rhule really hasn’t learned, I’m guessing Rhule is playing the competition card really heavy rn in attempt to boost our squad let’s see if this works.

Logic would dictate that but we are talking about Rhule. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, TheCasillas said:

He is getting reps there… 

Splitting them with Christensen...

We acknowledge that he's a rookie who has a lot to learn, yet we ask him to learn two positions and have him splitting reps with someone else at the spot where we believe he's designated.

What part of this sounds like a wise plan?

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Splitting them with Christensen...

We acknowledge that he's a rookie who has a lot to learn, yet we ask him to learn two positions and have him splitting reps with someone else at the spot where we believe he's designated.

What part of this sounds like a wise plan?

He isn’t learning two positions … at least from what I’ve been following. I haven’t seen anything about Ickey playing guard, but if you have something sharing that then… I agree.

Sounds like to me Bozeman and Ickey have always been on the field together until today. Someone mentioned in the main practice thread that this was intentional for them to build a relationship on the line. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Bryce = Alex Smith

      By strato · Posted

      Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • strato
      Should Canalas bring someone else in to call offensive plays?

      By strato · Posted

      We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Jay Roosevelt
      Carolina Panthers pick No. 19-2026 NFL Draft

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      Hoping Sonny Styles falls to us.
×
×
  • Create New...