Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots Joint Practice Day 2


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

That is the greatest report I have ever heard in the history of ESPN.

*ESPN ALERT*

Some fat woman suffered a bruised foot following skirmish that boiled over into the stands today at Patriots/Panthers practice.  Sources say woman was morbidly obese and holding the now discontinued Choco Taco when incident occurred.  More at 6pm.

Based on the description in the above comment, that was no fat lady.  Kelvin Benjamin was apparently at practice today. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Steelo Senpai said:

Weird to me slightly because he has the mythical final say over the roster. Why even roster the guy if you don’t like him. There were and are plenty of other depth options at FS. 🤷🏾‍♂️

Yeah, but sometimes you'd rather deal with a problem you know than one you don't...  It's pretty evident he doesnt prefer him over guys like Franklin who have played a similar role.  Robinson has been cut multiple times and stashed in the PS, then brought back.  And everytime he has seen the field, he has seemed to make big plays.  And IIRC, the official website ran an article later last season after he finally got an extended look and more snaps whete Rhule admitted he was playing great and that he shouldve been given more snaps/opportunities before.  And I want to say he described him as a guy with starter ability...  I also think he made the comments about BC having should've been given more snaps in that same article.

So Rhule has acknowledged the guy is good, has and does make plays for us whenever he is given the chance to, yet, he never seems to want him in that position to do so.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

They also worked rookie Cade Mays more at center on Wednesday. He's taken some snaps in the middle throughout camp though most of his work has come at guard. He's a versatile player, and that helps his chances of making the 53-man roster.

 

 

Interesting.  I was just telling a friend last night, with the disclaimer that I know it's preseason and we've only played one game, but Mays looked outstanding and we may have gotten a steal with him.  He was mean, nasty, and finishing blocks with bad intentions against WAS.  From what I saw, I can see starter potential, and a very good starter at that...  although I thought it would be at guard, that would be amazing if he could step up and secure the center spot away from Elflien while Bozeman is out.  I believed and thought that Bozeman would be the starter, but Rhule's reluctance to put him ahead of Elf, and the seeming emergence of Mays seems like right place at the right time kind of stuff.  It's also a sign of a great team on the come up...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Interesting.  I was just telling a friend last night, with the disclaimer that I know it's preseason and we've only played one game, but Mays looked outstanding and we may have gotten a steal with him.  He was mean, nasty, and finishing blocks with bad intentions against WAS.  From what I saw, I can see starter potential, and a very good starter at that...  although I thought it would be at guard, that would be amazing if he could step up and secure the center spot away from Elflien while Bozeman is out.  I believed and thought that Bozeman would be the starter, but Rhule's reluctance to put him ahead of Elf, and the seeming emergence of Mays seems like right place at the right time kind of stuff.  It's also a sign of a great team on the come up...

Yeah I know it was against 2nd/3rd string but I'd put Mays and Pleasants above Jordan/Erving asap. They looked like they actually knew what they were doing and wanted to do it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Interesting.  I was just telling a friend last night, with the disclaimer that I know it's preseason and we've only played one game, but Mays looked outstanding and we may have gotten a steal with him.  He was mean, nasty, and finishing blocks with bad intentions against WAS.  From what I saw, I can see starter potential, and a very good starter at that...  although I thought it would be at guard, that would be amazing if he could step up and secure the center spot away from Elflien while Bozeman is out.  I believed and thought that Bozeman would be the starter, but Rhule's reluctance to put him ahead of Elf, and the seeming emergence of Mays seems like right place at the right time kind of stuff.  It's also a sign of a great team on the come up...

I had a similar conversation he seems to have it for a Olineman. He’s played there before if we can coach him up I could see him being a gem of the draft helping us solidify a solid well above average oline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All in all seems like a good day.

The team stood up for CMC. WIN

Someone pushed a Patriot but gave him a soft landing spot. WIN

The fat woman got the most action she's likely had in a while.  WIN

When asked about the the limp, she gets to say, "Yeah, it's an old football injury." WIN

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Interesting.  I was just telling a friend last night, with the disclaimer that I know it's preseason and we've only played one game, but Mays looked outstanding and we may have gotten a steal with him.  He was mean, nasty, and finishing blocks with bad intentions against WAS.  From what I saw, I can see starter potential, and a very good starter at that...  although I thought it would be at guard, that would be amazing if he could step up and secure the center spot away from Elflien while Bozeman is out.  I believed and thought that Bozeman would be the starter, but Rhule's reluctance to put him ahead of Elf, and the seeming emergence of Mays seems like right place at the right time kind of stuff.  It's also a sign of a great team on the come up...

Lots of analysts had Mays as a first round pick going into this season, and its not like he played poorly at Tennessee last year.  We very well may have getting a gem. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Interesting.  I was just telling a friend last night, with the disclaimer that I know it's preseason and we've only played one game, but Mays looked outstanding and we may have gotten a steal with him.  He was mean, nasty, and finishing blocks with bad intentions against WAS.  From what I saw, I can see starter potential, and a very good starter at that...  although I thought it would be at guard, that would be amazing if he could step up and secure the center spot away from Elflien while Bozeman is out.  I believed and thought that Bozeman would be the starter, but Rhule's reluctance to put him ahead of Elf, and the seeming emergence of Mays seems like right place at the right time kind of stuff.  It's also a sign of a great team on the come up...

We passed up another late round UT OL Trey Smith over health concerns that turned out pretty good.  I believe Mays was fighting through injuries last year, but his brother is also on the team and his dad played OL for UT as well back in the day.  (I live in Knoxville).

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

So.....

Horn looks like a top 10 pick.

Baker might be A Dude.

Darnold proved he is who we thought he was.

Might have some playmakers at WR.

OL could be suspect.

DL could be suspect.

Secondary might be nasty.

We will fight any MFer out there.

 

Anything else from the Pats practices I am forgetting?

CMC? There was that tweet yesterday about him having his way with the Pats' defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

CMC? There was that tweet yesterday about him having his way with the Pats' defense.

Yeah, that's pretty much the same as the BB being a douche quote. That is something that is expected.

CMC's ability shouldn't really ever be questioned. His ability to stay healthy, however.......definitely. 

He never stopped being the best dual threat RB in the NFL. He just stopped being healthy enough to play on Sundays.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, that's pretty much the same as the BB being a douche quote. That is something that is expected.

CMC's ability shouldn't really ever be questioned. His ability to stay healthy, however.......definitely. 

He never stopped being the best dual threat RB in the NFL. He just stopped being able to play on Sundays.

Yeah, I had considered making a comment about him only being available for 4-5 games but decided against it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

Yeah, I had considered making a comment about him only being available for 4-5 games but decided against it.

Yeah, sadly he just cannot be counted on to play a full season and perhaps not even half a season.

But we are better suited to "replace" him in the lineup than we were.

Ultimately the biggest flaw in Rhule's plan of having a "run first" team is that our franchise RB isn't capable of staying healthy. The second biggest flaw is that we aren't sure we have the OL to dominate in the run game.

The latter issue MAY be somewhat solved. The former is unlikely. We will just have to see what happens in 2022.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I went to McDonald's at lunch got a combo for $12. It was ok. The next day I ordered lunch from Cracker Barrel got the broccoli cheddar chicken, steak fries, and 2 biscuits paid $12 with tip. Guess which was better. 
    • QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 is a diagnostic tool provided by Intuit to help users resolve common issues related to company files in QuickBooks Desktop. It is designed to diagnose and repair problems that may prevent users from opening, accessing, or using their company files properly. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore what QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 is, how it works, and how you can use it to troubleshoot and fix issues with your QuickBooks company files effectively. To help you fix this problem, we have some resources in this article. But if you need expert help, you can contact us anytime. We have a team of QuickBooks experts who are available 24/7 to assist you. Just call our support line at  +1-844-476-5438. What is QuickBooks File Doctor? QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 is a standalone application developed by Intuit to assist users in diagnosing and resolving issues related to QuickBooks company files. It combines the functionality of two previously separate tools: the QuickBooks Company File Diagnostic Tool and the QuickBooks Network Connectivity Diagnostic Tool. QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 can diagnose and repair a wide range of issues, including network connectivity problems, data corruption, and file integrity issues. Method 2: How Does QuickBooks File Doctor Work? QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 works by scanning and analyzing QuickBooks company files to identify and repair any issues that may be affecting their functionality. The tool employs advanced diagnostic algorithms to detect problems with company files and automatically fix them whenever possible. QuickBooks File Doctor can repair common issues such as network errors, data corruption, and file damage, helping users restore their company files to a healthy state. Method 3: How to Use QuickBooks File Doctor Using QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 is relatively straightforward. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to use the tool: Download and Install QuickBooks File Doctor: Start by downloading QuickBooks File Doctor from the official Intuit website. Once downloaded, run the installation file and follow the on-screen instructions to install the tool on your computer. Launch QuickBooks File Doctor: After installing QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438, launch the application by double-clicking its icon on your desktop or searching for it in the Windows Start menu. Select Company File: In QuickBooks File Doctor, you’ll be prompted to select the company file you want to diagnose and repair. Choose the company file from the list or browse to locate it on your computer. Diagnose and Repair: Once you’ve selected the company file, QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 will begin scanning it for issues. The tool will automatically detect and repair any problems it finds, such as network connectivity issues, data corruption, or file integrity issues. Follow On-Screen Instructions: Throughout the diagnostic and repair process, QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438will provide on-screen instructions and prompts to guide you through the steps. Follow these instructions carefully to ensure that the tool can effectively diagnose and repair issues with your company file. Review Repair Results: After completing the diagnostic and repair process, QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 will display a summary of the results. Review the results to ensure that the tool has successfully resolved any issues with your company file. Verify File Integrity: Once QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 has repaired your company file, it’s a good idea to verify its integrity by opening it in QuickBooks Desktop and checking for any remaining issues or errors.
    • I don't think so. I think once you're measuring electronically, the spot is where the sensor says it is. So if it says half yard short of the line to gain, that's the spot. Now how that works with scrums and the ball moving on two minute drills and poo is anybody's guess.
×
×
  • Create New...