Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Please post all your RHULE SUCKS posts here..HATE THREAD


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

In no way am I defending Rhule's performance. Never have, so I don't have to defend poo, chief.  I'm just tired of hearing grown men shriek like bitches constantly in a forum that used to be a fun place to get news about my favorite football team.

The inflammatory crybaby poo used to only be for troll alts. Now it's gotten to the point that if we made it to the superbowl and lost because of a missed FG from a backup kicker we had to sign because of injury, you would blame it on Rhule's training camp rep frequency. 

When the team is objectively and decidedly performing poorly, what would you expect fans to do?

You want everybody to be sunshine and rainbows over five wins a season? Why should they be?

And if, buy your own admissions, you can't defend his performance, why does it bother you so much that people are criticizing him?

His performance is pretty much the most important factor in whether he stays on as coach or not. Do you think that's somehow unfair?

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

When the team is objectively and decidedly performing poorly, what would you expect fans to do?

Team hasn't performed this year. Wait until there's actually something to cry about.

 

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

You want everybody to be sunshine and rainbows over five wins a season? Why should they be?

New OC, new OL, New QB. Those are 3 pretty important pieces. Even you should be able to figure out that there's a possibility that this year might be different.

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

And if, buy your own admissions, you can't defend his performance, why does it bother you so much that people are criticizing him?

 

This is you making poo up. I didn't admit poo. As someone who hasn't defended Rhule, I don't owe you a defense or explanation of anything.

20 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

His performance is pretty much the most important factor in whether he stays on as coach or not. Do you think that's somehow unfair?

Again, I don't think it's unfair. It doesn't bother me that people criticize him. It's the teen-girl whining by the same posters, 200 times a day, ruining every single thread.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

Team hasn't performed this year. Wait until there's actually something to cry about.

New OC, new OL, New QB. Those are 3 pretty important pieces. Even you should be able to figure out that there's a possibility that this year might be different.

This is you making poo up. I didn't admit poo. As someone who hasn't defended Rhule, I don't owe you a defense or explanation of anything.

Again, I don't think it's unfair. It doesn't bother me that people criticize him. It's the teen-girl whining by the same posters, 200 times a day, ruining every single thread.

Well then perhaps you should wait until there's something to cheer about as well 🤔

And again, all the optimism about Rhule is based on some form of "well, it's possible". Cool. It's also possible that Sam Darnold becomes a great quarterback this season. I'm not exactly seeing a lot of signs pointing to it, though.

Kudos for "I don't have to defend him or explain anything" though. That's a great dodge. Sounds way better than "I don't actually have anything to support my argument".

Means pretty much the same thing, though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well then perhaps you should wait until there's something to cheer about as well 🤔

And again, all the optimism about Rhule is based on some form of "well, it's possible". Cool. It's also possible that Sam Darnold becomes a great quarterback this season. I'm not exactly seeing a lot of signs pointing to it, though.

Kudos for "I don't have to defend him or explain anything" though. That's a great dodge. Sounds way better than "I don't actually have anything to support my argument".

Means pretty much the same thing, though...

I'm not cheering about anything. Just trying to get you crybabies to sack up a little bit. It's obvious that's impossible for you. Noted. 

Speaking of dodging. You are either dodging or a little bit dense if you don't think a new QB, OL, and OC make a difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I'm not cheering about anything. Just trying to get you crybabies to sack up a little bit. It's obvious that's impossible for you. Noted. 

Speaking of dodging. You are either dodging or a little bit dense if you don't think a new QB, OL, and OC make a difference. 

Ah, but we don't know how things are going to turn out this season...remember?

Will things be different? Sure.

Does that mean winning? Unknown.

Oh, and please don't act like cheering for a losing team is "sacking up" when it basically amounts to accepting whatever mediocrity is fed to you.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Ah, but we don't know how things are going to turn out this season...remember?

Will things be different? Sure.

Does that mean winning? Unknown.

Oh, and please don't act like cheering for a losing team is "sacking up" when it basically amounts to accepting whatever mediocrity is fed to you.

So to you, not whining is cheering. Got it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

So to you, not whining is cheering. Got it. 

More accurate to state that bending over and saying "thank you sir, may I please have another" doesn't suit my definition of "sacking up".

People pay a lot of money to see these games. None of those fans should be told that they should just accept mediocre results and be happy with it.

There are legitimate criticisms to be made about this team, and speaking those aloud does not amount to 'whining"...unless you're someone who thinks mediocrity is okay.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Canes now have 19 losses on the year. Here is the truly alarming stat. 13 of those were multiple goal loses. 9 of those were 3 goal plus losses. This team is getting blown out more than any other year under Rod.     why?  Blue line is a total mess. It’s just no good with their combinations.  It pains me to say this, but they were mikes better with Burns and Orlov. They need Slavin so bad.  Health.  Size. The team is too small and has no physical play. Most forwards do not forecheck.  Worst under Rod.  Goalie play. Pretty average to sub par. PK is downright bad. It’s allowing a little over a goal a game. Worst under Rod.    Team will not win a playoff round under its current group of players. It’s not constructed to do so against heavy teams.      solutions.  Must get physical size by the trade deadline. Rod and Tulsky know this. That probably has to come with the 2C.  KKs size but a better scorer and meaner.  The need another physical winger.  Goalie. Either go all in on a top guy on a bad team or get average. Lastly, better defense. Need a Right shot heavy defenseman.  Yes that could mean someone’s favorite dman could sit. Looking at you Boom.    thats 3-4 new guys that must be brought in for them to have a chance at a cup.  And it’s all players that are different and better than what they have.  They have the cap. KK is gone. Add 4 mill back.    And then hope it’s jells unlike Mikko.  
×
×
  • Create New...