Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayfield comment on the Browns game


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, dynomite said:

Sounds like she said I hope you F them up and he said me too. Why would she go back on it? She already lost baker and the other players as a trusted media person 

When she was initially asked about it on the Around the NFL podcast, she stated those were his exact words.

I don't believe she lied, and as much as she's tried to spin things and walk back her comments, she's never actually denied that was what he said.

Yeah, she's likely screwed up her relationship with Baker and others, but personally I think the reaction to it has been overblown.

Hell, most of the people in this thread cheered him for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

When she was initially asked about it on the Around the NFL podcast, she stated those were his exact words.

I don't believe she lied, and as much as she's tried to spin things and walk back her comments, she's never actually denied that was what he said.

Yeah, she's likely screwed up her relationship with Baker and others, but personally I think the reaction to it has been overblown.

Hell, most of the people in this thread cheered him for it.

She went on this Browns youtube show and kinda made herself look even more suspect

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

When she was initially asked about it on the Around the NFL podcast, she stated those were his exact words.

I don't believe she lied, and as much as she's tried to spin things and walk back her comments, she's never actually denied that was what he said.

Yeah, she's likely screwed up her relationship with Baker and others, but personally I think the reaction to it has been overblown.

Hell, most of the people in this thread cheered him for it.

 

47 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Only a few people on here were actually bothered by it.

That said, I'm gonna call bullsh-t on Baker here.

I don't doubt for a second that he said it, but he probably figured it wouldn't go anywhere.

The denial is most likely damage control, and possibly requested by the team.

Based on what? This seems plain as day she fabricated this to get a few interviews and have a few talking points. She thought she could embellish and it would not explode on her, but got busted. Baker is brash, but to say something like that after deliberately laying low makes no sense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Panther_Path said:

Based on what? This seems plain as day she fabricated this to get a few interviews and have a few talking points. She thought she could embellish and it would not explode on her, but got busted. Baker is brash, but to say something like that after deliberately laying low makes no sense.

Yeah...that makes no sense at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Panther_Path said:

 

Based on what? This seems plain as day she fabricated this to get a few interviews and have a few talking points. She thought she could embellish and it would not explode on her, but got busted. Baker is brash, but to say something like that after deliberately laying low makes no sense.

The only way this is a story in any way (besides in the world because Baker is a story for some reason) is if it seen as him calling his shot or guaranteeing a win. Every player (at least those with any passion for the game) go into the game with that same mindset. I'm sure it's pretty much said in every pregame speech. 

For some reason, Baker equals story. I don't think he ever really did anything wrong while in Cleveland. Yeah he would go back and forth with reporters who trolled him but who cares, sometimes trolls need called out. He told a team mate who demanded to be traded that he didn't matter if he wasn't part of the team. Maybe a little harsh but entirely true. He felt betrayed that his former head coach went to a division rival the same week he was fired, not sure why he cared but I see no issue treating the enemy like the enemy. 

Obviously some media people and people in general don't like him just because he rubs them the wrong way. I guess it happens and it seems to happen to him significantly more than other players so maybe that's why most of the league is extremely bland and only gives coach speak. Baker is bland with his comments but not quite as much as some so I guess by comparison he may seem like an extreme case. 40 years ago he would be considered a QB introvert.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thomas31873 said:

Obviously some media people and people in general don't like him just because he rubs them the wrong way. I guess it happens and it seems to happen to him significantly more than other players so maybe that's why most of the league is extremely bland and only gives coach speak. Baker is bland with his comments but not quite as much as some so I guess by comparison he may seem like an extreme case. 40 years ago he would be considered a QB introvert.  

Kinda like another fairly successful QB around these parts . . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

She went on this Browns youtube show and kinda made herself look even more suspect

 

It sounds to me like Baker is telling the truth.  I think she was looking to break something big and blew up a benign co-sign that she created to try to do it.  

Also, if I'm not mistaken she is fairly new to beat reporting and/or reporting in general...  as long as I've been aware of her, she was a analytics/betting specialist on ESPN and then NFLN.  When I saw the report and it cited her as the Browns best reporter I was like, "WTF?  When did that happen?"  As long as I've been seeing her on TV, she has NEVER broken stories, she strictly covered the analytics and betting stuff.  So it seems to me like she was trying to get a story off...  I dont think it was malicious or anything.  I do believe she wanted to attention of breaking it, but I genuinely believe her that it stemmed from her excitement for Baker getting the opportunity to reestablish himself as a top QB in the league and they were likely just having off-the-record small talk and she wanted to get a great one-liner out there.  And iirc, Baker said earlier that he's known her a long time, so it sounded like they had a friendly relationship prior...  but, after this?  She might've ruined that.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

It sounds to me like Baker is telling the truth.  I think she was looking to break something big and blew up a benign co-sign that she created to try to do it.  

Also, if I'm not mistaken she is fairly new to beat reporting and/or reporting in general...  as long as I've been aware of her, she was a analytics/betting specialist on ESPN and then NFLN.  When I saw the report and it cited her as the Browns best reporter I was like, "WTF?  When did that happen?"  As long as I've been seeing her on TV, she has NEVER broken stories, she strictly covered the analytics and betting stuff.  So it seems to me like she was trying to get a story off...  I dont think it was malicious or anything.  I do believe she wanted to attention of breaking it, but I genuinely believe her that it stemmed from her excitement for Baker getting the opportunity to reestablish himself as a top QB in the league and they were likely just having off-the-record small talk and she wanted to get a great one-liner out there.  And iirc, Baker said earlier that he's known her a long time, so it sounded like they had a friendly relationship prior...  but, after this?  She might've ruined that.

Yeah for some reason she was a Bills sideline reporter for the game. She tried to reach out to Baker and he was like nah, why would he? She'd probably leak that exchange next time she's on TV. Baker did have a little snark when he mentioned the media is thirsty because he intentionally hasn't given them any headlines this offseason, which I agree with. I bet the NFL is already trying to get him Mic'd up for that game

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...