Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule, you're a fuging pussy. And an idiot.


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Castavar said:

Meanwhile, what a debut for Brian Daboll. He said fug playing for OT and went for the two point conversion because he wanted to win that fuggin game. He's shown more in his first game as HC than Rhule has in 3 years. Let that sink in.

Yup. Both Eberflus and Daboll had their teams prepared and disciplined out of the gate as rookie HCs. We looked like absolute garbage for 3 quarters. Ironically enough, those were the 2 the majority here wanted to can Rhule for. Ugh

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

Yup. Both Eberflus and Daboll had their teams prepared and disciplined out of the gate as rookie HCs. We looked like absolute garbage for 3 quarters. Ironically enough, those were the 2 the majority here wanted to can Rhule for. Ugh

As per Panther way, just a day late and a dollar short. We fugged around and kept Rhule instead of hiring one of these up and coming coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was watching that last field goal drive and running up the middle at 3rd and goal was so fuging dumb. Already in field goal range either way and you don't call up a play to win the game. If it's not there you can throw it away or take the sack and still get the field goal. Coaching scared when you tell your players they have to fight to earn their spots all camp long, then don't give them an opportunity on essentially a free play

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Was watching that last field goal drive and running up the middle at 3rd and goal was so fuging dumb. Already in field goal range either way and you don't call up a play to win the game. If it's not there you can throw it away or take the sack and still get the field goal. Coaching scared when you tell your players they have to fight to earn their spots all camp long, then don't give them an opportunity on essentially a free play

Rhule claimed it was because the muffed snap changed things.

But:

A) The muffed snap was again, because Rhule played Elf over Boze in the first place.

B) That's not an excuse, because like you said, you're already in FG range, so why not attempt something to get in the EZ.  

C) They claim they were running an RPO, like what we hit DJ on to start the drive.  I have no idea what it looked like after the fact, but considering Baker handed it off, I'm assuming the pass option was well-covered, so I think it's safe to say that wasn't a very creative call.

Honestly, they did what Rhule preferred - play conservative, and it cost us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Rhule claimed it was because the muffed snap changed things.

But:

A) The muffed snap was again, because Rhule played Elf over Boze in the first place.

B) That's not an excuse, because like you said, you're already in FG range, so why not attempt something to get in the EZ.  

C) They claim they were running an RPO, like what we hit DJ on to start the drive.  I have no idea what it looked like after the fact, but considering Baker handed it off, I'm assuming the pass option was well-covered, so I think it's safe to say that wasn't a very creative call.

Honestly, they did what Rhule preferred - play conservative, and it cost us.

Yeah at least spread it out like your gonna take a shot and have Baker run for a few yards or something. Total wasted play acting like there was only 20 seconds on the clock

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Castavar said:

Meanwhile, what a debut for Brian Daboll. He said fug playing for OT and went for the two point conversion because he wanted to win that fuggin game. He's shown more in his first game as HC than Rhule has in 3 years. Let that sink in.

I wanted Daboll or Flores, but I even look at what McDaniel did today.  And no one thought much of that hire when it happened.  He schooled Belichick.  

And here we are, still stuck with this fuging idiot who has a thorough, proven resume demonstrating how unqualified he is to hold the position - and he adds to it every fuging week.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davos said:

Yup. Both Eberflus and Daboll had their teams prepared and disciplined out of the gate as rookie HCs. We looked like absolute garbage for 3 quarters. Ironically enough, those were the 2 the majority here wanted to can Rhule for. Ugh

I thought Eberflus would have been a wonderful hire. He would have fixed that defense right up. Could have hired a number of guys to run the offense. Snow has never been qualified to run an NFL defense and Matt Rhule literally has no idea how to coach with the game on the line. How many 4th quarter leads has this team blown under their inept watch? I’m just over it. Time for qualified NFL caliber coaches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

I wanted Daboll or Flores, but I even look at what McDaniel did today.  And no one thought much of that hire when it happened.  He schooled Belichick.  

And here we are, still stuck with this fuging idiot who has a thorough, proven resume demonstrating how unqualified he is to hold the position - and he adds to it every fuging week.

That Shanahan/McVay offense is so much fun. In addition to McDaniel, O'Connell (Vikings rookie HC) had Minnesota rolling with it. My only concern is that by the time we adopt it, so many teams will be running it and it won't be as effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...