Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Three Top Corners.

Panthers Fan 69

By Panthers Fan 69,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

AceMan Experienced

AceMan

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

we're saying this after a game where Amari Cooper had 3 receptions for 17 yards.... DEP was the only recieveer that had over 50 yards. Brisset average 4 yards for completion and barely eclipsed 50% completion percetnage.

Stats won't show the two TD passes Jacoby terribly misses.  Amari Cooper should have 100+ yards and 2 TDs

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, AceMan said:

Stats won't show the two TD passes Jacoby terribly misses.  Amari Cooper should have 100+ yards and 2 TDs

but they didnt.. the scoreboard doesnt show us with a W bc the refs called a ghost call and a missed a huge call.

If we are giving out ghost stats, CMC should have had 200 yards total today but players tackled him. 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

i noticed in the 2nd half we brought Horn in the box with Chinn. The browns started to struggle with running the ball. There were a flew plays where Horn was in the backfield leading to some disruption of the plays.

My problem with Horn isn't his play. It's that we picked him over Fields. He's already covering Amari Cooper and winning most of those battles. Definitely would have given up a TD though on that one play. 

Edited by Snake
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

we're saying this after a game where Amari Cooper had 3 receptions for 17 yards.... DEP was the only recieveer that had over 50 yards. Brisset average 4 yards for completion and barely eclipsed 50% completion percetnage.

Yeah, it wasn't a pretty showing, but it was largely effective. I think part of that was the fact that we are actually talented, though inconsistent (which might be a bigger problem), but I also believe that Brissett sucking. 

We'll try again next week though. There is reason to be guardedly optimistic in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
Just now, Carl Spackler said:

A successful running game doesn't influence the passing game? Are you just splitting hairs to be a dick at this point, or what?

I dont even know what you are attemping to discuss. This thread is about our top 3 corners performance. Your comments just seem out of place in this thread. Maybe we can jump to another thread where are talking about the run game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted
Just now, TheCasillas said:

I dont even know what you are attemping to discuss. This thread is about our top 3 corners performance. Your comments just seem out of place in this thread. Maybe we can jump to another thread where are talking about the run game?

It's the same sort of approach as "the defense did great last year, it gave up very few yards," without considering the numerous short fields afforded opposing offenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
Just now, Snake said:

My problem with Horn isn't his play. It's that we picked him over Fields. He's already covering Amari Cooper and winning most of those battles. Definitely would have given up a TD though on that one play. 

The play he slipped and Xavier Woods was over the top? That wasnt a TD, but a decent gain. Horn got beat by a veteran at the line on a single play.. not sure we can use that to say he was a missed pick.

 

I also wouldnt be defending Fields.. the guy still doesnt look like an nfl QB. There is a reason the bears elected to pass the ball less than 20x times today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky Davis Veteran

Rocky Davis

Posted
Posted

I saw Horn lined up against the slot receiver way too much IMO.  Also, thought he used his hands way too much today.  I mean it's like his 4th NFL game (?) so we'll see how he evolves as the year goes on.

Donte is way overrated (at least to some) and will be roasted by good QBs repeatedly over the course of this season.

Henderson is like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.  He covers really well and makes some good plays at times and then goes completely insane and starts thinking he's in WWE.

Taylor is young, raw, and got roasted many times last year.  Maybe with more time he becomes solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...