Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The NFL does owe the Panthers an explanation why the Brissett spike was not intentional grounding.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

I'm fairly sure it is illegal to allow bets without their being public knowledge that it is a fair competition though.  I think if it is public knowledge that it's already happened then it's different.  That's how people bet on these reality shows and stuff at vegas for whatever dumb reason, but I think even if it is a private company, if they put out the illusion that it is a fair competition then it is treated differently.  I could be wrong though.

Considering we live in a country where our politicians are openly bribed, I have even less confident our sports leagues are "fair" either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the NFL does all the Panthers an explanation but the NFL is going to do what they want to do. because of the lack of public outcry following this mess, mostly due to the low priority of the Panthers in the media eyes. Had this been the Cowboys or the Patriots this would’ve been on every sports new cycle.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Considering we live in a country where our politicians are openly bribed, I have even less confident our sports leagues are "fair" either.

Be that as it may, he is correct. There are plenty of federal regulations designed to keep the integrity of athletic events. For example, 18 U.S. Code § 224 deals explicitly with bribery in sporting contests. 

The only thing that isn't "fair" imo is the selective enforcement of regulations.

Unfortunately, as we have seen with Deshaun Watson and others, people seem to care less about integrity and more about entertainment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Icege said:

Be that as it may, he is correct. There are plenty of federal regulations designed to keep the integrity of athletic events. For example, 18 U.S. Code § 224 deals explicitly with bribery in sporting contests. 

The only thing that isn't "fair" imo is the selective enforcement of regulations.

Unfortunately, as we have seen with Deshaun Watson and others, people seem to care less about integrity and more about entertainment.

Just because there is a law on the books, doesn't mean it is enforced. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Just because there is a law on the books, doesn't mean it is enforced. 

 

6 minutes ago, Icege said:

Be that as it may, he is correct. There are plenty of federal regulations designed to keep the integrity of athletic events. For example, 18 U.S. Code § 224 deals explicitly with bribery in sporting contests. 

The only thing that isn't "fair" imo is the selective enforcement of regulations.

Unfortunately, as we have seen with Deshaun Watson and others, people seem to care less about integrity and more about entertainment.

Jeff Goldblum What GIF by The Late Late Show with James Corden

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were calls  atrocious , yes

Will anything change about Sunday’s result, no

bottom line, play like a well coached, hungry, not scared team, make plays, and outside influences like those calls don’t matter 

The Panthers played like poo most of the game  no one to blame but themselves 

not trying to piss people off but it is the fact of life in the NFL  

Give the refs opportunity to influence the game or score and help Vegas odds and it seems like they will …just saying from decades of observation 

If the team takes care of its business then they are a non factor 

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am curious, I haven't got to see the game again on the NFLN.....

but two refs threw the flag.  They got talked out of it.   Wonder if the footage shows if the Browns HC got in any of their ears?  

I still don't see how you don't use your timeout in that moment and make a fuss (bonus of icing the kicker)....but it potentially could of given NY or wherever time to correct the ruling on the field.  Or just given Rhule a chance to get to whoever overturned w/ a simple discussion on the rule. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2022 at 5:24 PM, Castavar said:

It's actually impressive that the two worst calls of the game came on the Browns final drive to win the game..................Not.

Yeah, we put ourselves in positions to lose but you have to wonder if the refs have an interest to determine the outcomes. Organized crime, gambling addiction, or maybe the NFL wants the browns in the playoff hunt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...