Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: Best/Worst vs Browns

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, frankw said:

It isn’t perfect no statistical method is but when you get drubbed the way we did for an entire half and other teams are having success with their young players you can't just blame PFF for something you don't want to hear. Coaching and scheme all have a part but this is a team built on defense and they looked soft too often. But go ahead and poo another post Mr. Rager.

I just like watching you cry about it.

 

What didn't I want to hear again completlyfrank? I'm gonna assume it's your jackassery about two guys who have played a total of 5 NFL games.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You'd think PFF would not be so high on their own farts and their "algorithm" when a center has multiple bad snaps and still grades out decently. If you suck at snapping the football you suck at playing center by default. 

I think they go off of how the NFL records a stat. Apparently 4 of the 5 bad snaps were given to Baker and only one to Elfein. 

Which makes me wonder what the rule is for a bad snap...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I just like watching you cry about it.

 

What didn't I want to hear again completlyfrank? I'm gonna assume it's your jackassery about two guys who have played a total of 5 NFL games.

Like you're crying about PFF? This is a bottom tier franchise showing no signs of moving in the other direction and some of our highly touted draft picks have not looked good. I'm sorry you can't handle that big guy welcome to real life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I think they go off of how the NFL records a stat. Apparently 4 of the 5 bad snaps were given to Baker and only one to Elfein. 

Which makes me wonder what the rule is for a bad snap...

Well, the NFL puts every INT on the QB even when it bounces directly off a WR's hands and into the waiting arms of a defender. So I wouldn't put too much I to that. Probably has to be an absolute worm burner for the center to get the blame.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, frankw said:

Like you're crying about PFF? This is a bottom tier franchise showing no signs of moving in the other direction and some of our highly touted draft picks have not looked good. I'm sorry you can't handle that big guy welcome to real life.

You crack me up 🤣🤣🤣 

please go on. You have a severe case of Napoleon syndrome I see.

Please enlighten me further about Horn not looking great in one of his four games, elaborate on the delusion you have that a rookie LT should dominate the best pass rusher in the NFL... Oh I know sell everyone on Elflein being the second best player on the team?

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Well, the NFL puts every INT on the QB even when it bounces directly off a WR's hands and into the waiting arms of a defender. So I wouldn't put too much I to that. Probably has to be an absolute worm burner for the center to get the blame.

 

I am actually working in partnership with an agency that partners with Fanduel (on another project) but I found out they are working with the NFL to build a new stat: WR-INT. 

They are designing an algorythm that would identify if the WR is respoinsible for the INT rather than the QB. Last that I saw they were still defining the rule set. They are also working on a statistic called "clutch" for skill players. Basically using a % to define whether they caught the ball or did not catch the ball within the 2min warning and on 3rd/4th downs. 

Which reminds me, I need to see where they are at with that.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

You crack me up 🤣🤣🤣 

please go on. You have a severe case of Napoleon syndrome I see.

Please enlighten me further about Horn not looking great in one of his four games, elaborate on the delusion you have that a rookie LT should dominate the best pass rusher in the NFL... Oh I know sell everyone on Elflein being the second best player on the team?

Did Horn not get burnt? Did Icky not get beaten like a drum? I hope they get better but we passed on drafting our own franchise QB for a cornerback. This league isn't waiting around for our players or our coach to get their act together.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jmac
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By Jmac · Posted

      Nope
    • cranky
      Who is going to take a shot at Malik Willis

      By cranky · Posted

      So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • cranky
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By cranky · Posted

      Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...