Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About our OL


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Dogshit tier, looked like last year's group. Since paying Moton, his play has taken a nose drive....he was awful in this game.

 

27 minutes ago, Basbear said:

You may post a play or two, both he was terrible for the whole game. He was supposed to the rock solid vet, got beat up more than Ickey. Guess I need to lower my expectations.  

Is that the go to complaint for people who want something to complain about? They get paid and then....

Moton played fine Sunday and has been consistent even since signing his extension. Clowney didn't even sniff Baker until he was chased out of the pocket by Garrett or it collapsed due to pressure elsewhere. People try to poo on o-line and d-linemen so much and don't know what the hell they are even looking at. There were a number of plays that they ran stunts, brought pressure and Moton was a singular bright spot on the line. Clowney had a half a sack.  

Edited by NorthTryon
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthTryon said:

 

Is that the go to complaint for people who want something to complain about? They get paid and then....

Moton played fine Sunday and has been consistent even since signing his extension. Clowney didn't even sniff Baker until he was chased out of the pocket by Garrett or it collapsed due to pressure elsewhere. People try to poo on o-line and d-linemen so much and don't know what the hell they are even looking at. There were a number of plays that they ran stunts, brought pressure and Moton was a singular bright spot on the line. Clowney had a half a sack.  

You need to re-watch the game and focus on Moton. FYI I had a high hopes for him heading in.

After you re-watch the game, listen to old smitty whom shared my feelings- 

https://omny.fm/shows/the-kyle-bailey-show-podcast/the-clubhouse-steve-smith-56

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...