Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Person says the Panthers will win this one


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think the assumption we get to Jones is more hope than anything. Our pass rush last week was atrocious so it's hard for me to believe it exist until I see it. Daboll is too damn smart to not run it down Snow's throat. The O needs to set a realistic pace by running the ball early and get Baker in a much better situation than last week by working him into the game. Run then some playaction and then open it up if things are going smoothly. Keep it simple and balanced. 

Either team could just lay an egg in this one but I am guessing it will be a scrappy game from both teams. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

coin flip game.  the less stupid team wins the game. 

 

Same as week 1.

Last week it seemed both teams should be run heavy and whichever team that stopped running first would lose. I didn't have much faith in either team being smart.

Neither team was. Both teams seemed to come out pass heavy and overall the Browns were 1-1 passing and running though and the Panthers passed 3 times for every run. Panthers were more stupid.

I have no idea what the Giants defensive strength is so I don't know the smart game plan this week

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

No excuses now, we have to win.  Thats a lot of defense that is going to be out for them

Yeah their secondary is Xavier Mckinney at safety and then a bunch of back ups. ILB's are whatever, 3-4 interior guys will get pressure on our IOL but otherwise no reason we can't get CMC/Baker moving around in the backfield. Winks scheme is designed for man coverage and they don't have the secondary guys to do it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Thomas31873 said:

Same as week 1.

Last week it seemed both teams should be run heavy and whichever team that stopped running first would lose. I didn't have much faith in either team being smart.

Neither team was. Both teams seemed to come out pass heavy and overall the Browns were 1-1 passing and running though and the Panthers passed 3 times for every run. Panthers were more stupid.

I have no idea what the Giants defensive strength is so I don't know the smart game plan this week

 

yep.  

I know the Giants will run the football though.  New coach seems smart enough that we are getting a full dose of Barkley. 

Who knows what the Panther O will attempt to be. 

Got know clue what either D will attempt to do. 

Matt Rhule's teams IMO tend to do something dumb and almost go overkill the other direction sometimes so that's something to watch.    

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Thomas31873 said:

Same as week 1.

Last week it seemed both teams should be run heavy and whichever team that stopped running first would lose. I didn't have much faith in either team being smart.

Neither team was. Both teams seemed to come out pass heavy and overall the Browns were 1-1 passing and running though and the Panthers passed 3 times for every run. Panthers were more stupid.

I have no idea what the Giants defensive strength is so I don't know the smart game plan this week

 

They stuffed Derrick Henry up the middle all game long for a total of 83 yards. It's a new 3-4ish scheme and only the DT's and ILB's are pretty good. CMC has to get to the edge or leak through for some YAC check downs. WR's should be open all day if Baker has time

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

No excuses now, we have to win.  Thats a lot of defense that is going to be out for them

I think last year the Giants entire offense was hurt or something like that.   There is no game I feel confident in at this stage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Coreyl90 said:

I don't think we'll see Saquon run wild. I think last week was a fluke and they'll tighten up going forward

Based on what? No new personnel, same DC that we've seen get gashed by the run for years now... signs do not point to such a conclusion.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...