Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I believed in Baker. But I was wrong. Also, the OL sucks ass.


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PhillyB said:

how many throws did baker actually miss? i counted three game changing drops from shi smith alone. more from others (thomas, CMC) plus fumbles and poo, baker was hardly the problem here imo

and let's not forget the tackles played horribly and he was running for his life every down 

You know the site bruv....none of the QBs have been even top 3 offensive concerns.

Its just glorious how they overplay bad play by some and have trash other players in the HoF. Our WR corps sucks and is trash. We have DJ Moore and that's it. They just don't watch NFL football. They turn the Panthers on then that's it after the game they don't see how literally 4th stringers would run circles around our guys all over the NFL shop here. 

Bad TE, Bad WR, Worst OL but its Darnold no now Cam comes to save the day no now Cam sucks no now PJ comes to no he sucks now Baker comes to no now he sucks.....

Its part of the fun now tbh

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

I wasn't expecting the Giants backup CB's to be blanketing our WR's all game long. That didn't help. I barely saw anyone open, I put it on McAdoo having a shitty game plan. We had 3 quarters of opportunity to run the ball down their throats and we did whatever that was

That was my feeling in watching, but I tend to fixate during live games on the ball-carrier, so I'll need to rewatch the coverages. 

I don't understand the game plan at all though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

how many throws did baker actually miss? i counted three game changing drops from shi smith alone. more from others (thomas, CMC) plus fumbles and poo, baker was hardly the problem here imo

and let's not forget the tackles played horribly and he was running for his life every down 

I don't dispute it is incredibly hard to evaluate any of these guys under this staff.  Baker has had moments.  But the overthrow to Shi on the broken play was probably the most egregious.  I saw a lot of people blame Shi, but he had no shot at it.

And that drive in the 4th where he threw 3 straight times, including two horrible decisions were also really bad.

When guys get over the top, we have to hit them, and we don't.  But I also won't dispute, the OL playing like a sieve didn't help his cause at all.  It's just that even with finally getting the run game going, our offense still looked atrocious for most of the game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I wasn't expecting the Giants backup CB's to be blanketing our WR's all game long. That didn't help. I barely saw anyone open, I put it on McAdoo having a shitty game plan. We had 3 quarters of opportunity to run the ball down their throats and we did whatever that was

They also had two backups on the DL.....

This team has no talent lol. The imaginary play that goes on in peoples head during the offseason literally has a lot of these people too far gone. It really would help for them to put on other games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I wasn't expecting the Giants backup CB's to be blanketing our WR's all game long. That didn't help. I barely saw anyone open, I put it on McAdoo having a shitty game plan. We had 3 quarters of opportunity to run the ball down their throats and we did whatever that was

I agree, the scheme is the biggest problem.  I kept alluding to how easy the Giants were getting their scrubs open with their use of tight, doubles, and stack formations along with route combinations like drags overlapping each other or in tandem with flats.  

We just ran fuging spread formations and their nobodies clamped our receivers up.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...