Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I believed in Baker. But I was wrong. Also, the OL sucks ass.

Proudiddy

By Proudiddy,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, PhillyB said:

how many throws did baker actually miss? i counted three game changing drops from shi smith alone. more from others (thomas, CMC) plus fumbles and poo, baker was hardly the problem here imo

and let's not forget the tackles played horribly and he was running for his life every down 

You know the site bruv....none of the QBs have been even top 3 offensive concerns.

Its just glorious how they overplay bad play by some and have trash other players in the HoF. Our WR corps sucks and is trash. We have DJ Moore and that's it. They just don't watch NFL football. They turn the Panthers on then that's it after the game they don't see how literally 4th stringers would run circles around our guys all over the NFL shop here. 

Bad TE, Bad WR, Worst OL but its Darnold no now Cam comes to save the day no now Cam sucks no now PJ comes to no he sucks now Baker comes to no now he sucks.....

Its part of the fun now tbh

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AlphabetsEnd Rising Star

AlphabetsEnd

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jackie Lee said:

I wasn't expecting the Giants backup CB's to be blanketing our WR's all game long. That didn't help. I barely saw anyone open, I put it on McAdoo having a shitty game plan. We had 3 quarters of opportunity to run the ball down their throats and we did whatever that was

That was my feeling in watching, but I tend to fixate during live games on the ball-carrier, so I'll need to rewatch the coverages. 

I don't understand the game plan at all though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

how many throws did baker actually miss? i counted three game changing drops from shi smith alone. more from others (thomas, CMC) plus fumbles and poo, baker was hardly the problem here imo

and let's not forget the tackles played horribly and he was running for his life every down 

I don't dispute it is incredibly hard to evaluate any of these guys under this staff.  Baker has had moments.  But the overthrow to Shi on the broken play was probably the most egregious.  I saw a lot of people blame Shi, but he had no shot at it.

And that drive in the 4th where he threw 3 straight times, including two horrible decisions were also really bad.

When guys get over the top, we have to hit them, and we don't.  But I also won't dispute, the OL playing like a sieve didn't help his cause at all.  It's just that even with finally getting the run game going, our offense still looked atrocious for most of the game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I wasn't expecting the Giants backup CB's to be blanketing our WR's all game long. That didn't help. I barely saw anyone open, I put it on McAdoo having a shitty game plan. We had 3 quarters of opportunity to run the ball down their throats and we did whatever that was

They also had two backups on the DL.....

This team has no talent lol. The imaginary play that goes on in peoples head during the offseason literally has a lot of these people too far gone. It really would help for them to put on other games

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I wasn't expecting the Giants backup CB's to be blanketing our WR's all game long. That didn't help. I barely saw anyone open, I put it on McAdoo having a shitty game plan. We had 3 quarters of opportunity to run the ball down their throats and we did whatever that was

I agree, the scheme is the biggest problem.  I kept alluding to how easy the Giants were getting their scrubs open with their use of tight, doubles, and stack formations along with route combinations like drags overlapping each other or in tandem with flats.  

We just ran fuging spread formations and their nobodies clamped our receivers up.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • PNW_PantherMan
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...